On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:33:13 -0800, SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com>
wrote in <47bc71b5$0$36410$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>:

>Todd H. wrote:
>
>> As for a cite, anyone who visited news.cnet.com today would've tripped
>> over the headline:
>>
>> http://www.news.com/Sprint-expected-...l?tag=nefd.top
>
>Actually I saw the "$60-80" from
>"http://www.forbes.com/feeds/ap/2008/02/20/ap4676170.html"
>
>It's always amusing to see "he who must not be named" demanding
>citations for widely disseminated news stories, while at the same time
>never providing citations for any of the claims he makes up, and never
>providing any factual basis for disputing any of the citations that
>others make.

Total nonsense.

>He's never provided a citation for extended GSM, despite repeated requests.

Actually several of them.

>He's never provided a citation disputing the accuracy of the network
>quality surveys, despite repeated requests.

Actually several of them.

>He's never provided a citation disputing the USA Today story that Apple
>approached Verizon with the iPhone prior to going to Cingular/AT&T,
>despite repeated requests.

There's no need to refute spin solely from Verizon.
The other companies don't comment.

>He complains that people treat him badly, but if he would change his
>behavior he would be forgiven and perhaps he could make some useful
>contributions.

Total nonsense.

--
Best regards,
John Navas <http:/navasgroup.com>

"Usenet is like a herd of performing elephants with diarrhea - massive,
difficult to redirect, awe inspiring, entertaining, and a source of mind
boggling amounts of excrement when you least expect it." --Gene Spafford