"Anybody" <anybody@anywhere-anytime.com> wrote in message
news:280320080909436131%anybody@anywhere-anytime.com...
> In article <kiLGj.2740$p24.1851@nlpi061.nbdc.sbc.com>, "Kevin Weaver"
> <kevinkeithweaver@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
>> "Anybody" <anybody@anywhere-anytime.com> wrote in message
>> news:270320081812443999%anybody@anywhere-anytime.com...
>> > In article
>> > <972be797-e3b8-4224-ac6f-05bf5c289ca2@u69g2000hse.googlegroups.com>,
>> > 4phun <vic.healey@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Chalk up another developer up for the iPhone App Watch: **Microsoft**.
>> >> Microsoft has a small team called the MacBU that develops the very
>> >> successful Office Suite for the Mac -- an office suite that until the
>> >> recent version was widely thought to be more advanced than even its
>> >> Windows counterpart and in some ways a "test bed" for features that
>> >> would eventually make it into the Windows version of Office. It may
>> >> surprise some to hear that Microsoft is looking at the iPhone for
>> >> development, but it ought not.
>> >>
>> >> http://phonedifferent.com/2008/03/mi...ss_unit_t.html
>> >
>> > Just what we need: iPhone versions of the blue screen of death and
>> > other bug-ridden rubbish. :-\
>>
>> Being it can only run one app at a time, why should that be a problem ?
>>
>> How else are they going to get a office suite into the iPhone along with
>> both Microsoft Exchange and ActiveSync support without Microsoft ?
>
> You don't. What you do is the reverse and get rid of Microsoft from the
> IT industry. It's only so invasive and "neccessary" because so many
> fools keep buying and using their garbage.


Never happen as apple has already gone to Microsoft.