Mike S. wrote:
> In article <47f831a6$0$36405$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>,
> SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote:
>> plenty900@yahoo.com wrote:
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> Anybody here used the CECT P168?
>>> I've only met one person who has it but she says it works fine.
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>> It's not good for the U.S. as it lacks the most popular GSM band in the
>> U.S., 850 MHz. If you only have 1900 MHz for the U.S. then your coverage
>> will be very, very poor.
>
> The latest shipments of the P168+ are quad-band GSM.

This isn't clear. Look at
"http://storesense2.megawebservers.com/stores/h/HS6191/cataloglist.html"

Where they now have a tri-band North American version, but still no quad
band. "http://zydaglo.com" Not much use in Europe and Asia.

Where did you see a quad band?

No voice-dialing (like the iPhone).

No Wi-Fi.