In article <47fcc0aa$0$36365$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>,
SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote:
>Mike S. wrote:
>> In article <47f831a6$0$36405$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>,
>> SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote:
>>> plenty900@yahoo.com wrote:
>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>
>>>> Anybody here used the CECT P168?
>>>> I've only met one person who has it but she says it works fine.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>> It's not good for the U.S. as it lacks the most popular GSM band in the
>>> U.S., 850 MHz. If you only have 1900 MHz for the U.S. then your coverage
>>> will be very, very poor.
>>
>> The latest shipments of the P168+ are quad-band GSM.
>
>This isn't clear. Look at
>"http://storesense2.megawebservers.com/stores/h/HS6191/cataloglist.html"
>
>Where they now have a tri-band North American version, but still no quad
>band. "http://zydaglo.com" Not much use in Europe and Asia.
>
>Where did you see a quad band?

http://cgi.ebay.com/CECT-iPhone-Quad...QQcmdZViewItem

>No voice-dialing (like the iPhone).
>
>No Wi-Fi.

In spite of the OP's assertion, this is very very far from being an iPhone
clone.