On 2008-04-10, SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote:
> Todd Allcock wrote:
>> At 10 Apr 2008 08:26:47 -0700 SMS wrote:
>>
>>> Of course if you really care about exposure to radiation, use CDMA,
>>> which has much less radiation.
>>
>> Do you care to back that up, or is this another of your "unbiased" CDMA vs.
>> GSM comparisons?
>
> You can learn more about it at "http://www.mobicare.com/news.asp?idNews=4".

I think I'd trust the actual SAR measurements more than that explanation
of why the SAR measurements should apparently be something else. It also
seems to be a bit confused about peak versus average power output, which
may be the reason why the SAR values in real life aren't like he thinks
they should be.

Dennis Ferguson