On 03 Jun 2008 21:33:23 GMT, Bert Hyman <bert@iphouse.com> wrote:

>In news:a7cb445escqetqud8qol977tiv0v0sdu8n@4ax.com David G. Imber
><imber@maniform.com> wrote:
>
>> I will believe that it's a hoax when there is evidence
>> from which to draw that conclusion.
>
>Rather than believing any magic trick they're shown, most people take a
>different approach and assume it's a trick until offered proof that it's
>real.

You're not getting me, which is why I was arguing with your
initial responses (respectfully). I ASSUMED it was a trick. I'm the
most reason-based person you'll meet. But tricks have solutions. I
haven't seen one from you or anyone else. Therefore I can't call it a
trick until I see evidence of how it came to be. Right now I have a
video which, on the surface, gives me nothing (or at least I can spot
nothing) like evidence. I'm left with an assumption that it's a trick,
but an assumption with no inherent truth value.

DGI