anon wrote:
> In article <487b852a$0$7329$607ed4bc@cv.net>,
> "Carl" <crothman@NOSPAMoptonline.net> wrote:
>
>> I'm not a personal fan of Larry's particularly, but his points
>> about iPhone's deficits are generally accurate
>
> Larry is a troll and self admitted criminal. He has been proven to be
> about 90% incorrect.
>
>> seeking "reliable info" and should be taken into account in seeking a
>> viewpoint which is balanced against the over-exuberance of, say, an
>> Oxford
>> or 4phun. Taken TOGETHER, one may gain a balanced picture.
>
> This is the Fox News "fair and balanced" argument and it makes no
> sense. The truth is NOT balanced, it is the truth.
>
> For the most part,Oxford and 4Phun post facts. They should NOT be
> taken together with Larry's opinions and falsehoods.
>
Read Todd's post in response to this. He says it much better than I can, and
he's been a member of this group longer, so he has a better handle on each
player.

However, I do want to emphasize, in line with one aspect of Todd's post,
that upon reading YOUR post, I immediately thought you had a problem
distinguishing between opinions and facts. Neither Oxford nor 4phun
typically post citations for their expressed "facts". That you believe them
on the face value of them saying so just means that you're a biased observer
yourself.

Regardless of your opinion of Larry (and mine by the way), his list of
"questions" about iPhone functionality had a lot of merit, imo. Those
questions should not just be blown off as the rantings of a crazy person.
They have validity and beg for answers.