In article <jgkeegan-CC377F.22141708122006@individual.net>,
"james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote:

> In article <pqrjn2dn2a6l66c0prbgkuokluu0n6sjej@4ax.com>,
> John Navas <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 08 Dec 2006 12:10:02 -0800, SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com>
> > wrote in <4579c6a4$0$82534$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>:
> >
> > >... However the story is different in Korea, where
> > >it's relatively easy to use a CDMA phone, as well as in China, India,
> > >etc. New CDMA networks are being deployed in a lot of countries, and
> > >coverage is expanding in existing countries. It's not that these
> > >countries were so keen on a second standard, but in the densely
> > >populated countries, they needed the higher efficiency of CDMA.
> >
> > In fact CDMA2000 is on the decline, but in and out of the USA; e.g.,
> > signs that India may switch from CDMA2000 to GSM.
>
> in fact, cdma is the fastest growing technology in china. you need to
> stop talking about things you are ignorant of, john. doing so, as you
> do often lately, makes you look silly and lessens your credibility to
> speak to any subject you might know something about.

Anus navas worships Nokia. Whatever Nokia claims or says must be right.
Actually, this is another case of navas cut and paste.