In article <nospam-CDD256.23053708122006@news-fe-03.texas.rr.com>,
sw <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:

> In article <jgkeegan-CC377F.22141708122006@individual.net>,
> "james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > In article <pqrjn2dn2a6l66c0prbgkuokluu0n6sjej@4ax.com>,
> > John Navas <spamfilter0@navasgroup.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 08 Dec 2006 12:10:02 -0800, SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com>
> > > wrote in <4579c6a4$0$82534$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>:
> > >
> > > >... However the story is different in Korea, where
> > > >it's relatively easy to use a CDMA phone, as well as in China, India,
> > > >etc. New CDMA networks are being deployed in a lot of countries, and
> > > >coverage is expanding in existing countries. It's not that these
> > > >countries were so keen on a second standard, but in the densely
> > > >populated countries, they needed the higher efficiency of CDMA.
> > >
> > > In fact CDMA2000 is on the decline, but in and out of the USA; e.g.,
> > > signs that India may switch from CDMA2000 to GSM.
> >
> > in fact, cdma is the fastest growing technology in china. you need to
> > stop talking about things you are ignorant of, john. doing so, as you
> > do often lately, makes you look silly and lessens your credibility to
> > speak to any subject you might know something about.
>
> Anus navas worships Nokia. Whatever Nokia claims or says must be right.
> Actually, this is another case of navas cut and paste.

i admit it .... i am astounded at the volume of incorrect information
he puts out.