On Fri, 3 Jul 2009 16:14:12 -0700, Steve Sobol <sjsobol@JustThe.net>
wrote in <MPG.24b830a3a0c9472e9896cd@news.justthe.net>:

>In article <q0ms451g09an8ldsbvgdi3db2pbpir1fuv@4ax.com>, spamfilter1
>@navasgroup.com says...
>
>> >There's actually two parts to your "actually." First, in many parts of
>> >the country there is no 3G yet on T-Mobile. Second, at least in the
>> >western region, even if there is technically 3G, T-Mobile coverage is
>> >very lacking.
>>
>> Still not over your anti-GSM agenda, I see -- T-Mobile 3G coverage is
>> actually quite good here in Northern California, as shown in the
>> coverage map I posted earlier, and as anyone knows with any actual
>> experience on the T-Mobile 3G network.
>
>They're rolling out in the bigger cities, yes, but there are still a lot
>of places, like Victorville, where T-Mo doesn't have 3G yet and there is
>no ETA.
>
>We're a little over an hour northeast of Los Angeles.

Fair enough, although Victorville is in the high desert with a
population of about 100K, and what I wrote was "Northern California",
much farther than an "hour northeast of Los Angeles".

I spent the 4th weekend in the Sacramento area, and had good 3G coverage
from Davis to Roseville and down toward Stockton.

--
Best regards,
John <http:/navasgroup.com>

If the iPhone is really so impressive,
why do iFans keep making excuses for it?