RAZR 2?

In message <slrnfsu93n.4g.dcferguson@akit-ferguson.com> Dennis Ferguson
<dcferguson@pacbell.net> wrote:

>On 2008-03-04, DevilsPGD <spam_narf_spam@crazyhat.net> wrote:
>> In message <fqjsjs$3gl$1@registered.motzarella.org> "Victek"
>><victek@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>>> The V9 is a fantastic phone, although once in a while I find that a key
>>>> press gets dropped in menus. It's relatively rare though.
>>>>
>>>> The amazing battery life and noise cancellation make it a substantial
>>>> upgrade to my first generation V3 though.
>>>
>>>Are you saying the battery life on the V9 (V9m?) is good? This is the one
>>>feature that is consistently criticized in the phonescoop reviews.
>>
>> It was actually pretty decent vs my original Razr, but only while in 3G
>> areas. In GSM mode, it seemed to be a lot more of a pig.
>
>I don't know. I have a European V9 which can only use GSM in North America,
>but I haven't noticed any problem keeping it charged. I think this is
>also the best sounding GSM phone I have ever owned, and it works better
>at my house (a somewhat marginal signal area) than the V3 it replaced.
>
>I promised myself I wouldn't buy another Motorola phone, but this was
>the only phone I could find with all the features I wanted. I haven't
>been disappointed (yet).
>
>I don't think the GSM V9 and the CDMA V9m have much in common, however,
>so I don't think reports about one say anything about the other.

I had a GSM V9. With regards to battery life, I was very pleased in 3G
mode, but only moderately impressed in GSM mode. Both were better then
my V3, which is all I really asked.

Sound quality, especially the noise cancellation, was simply amazing,
and I'd highly recommend the V9 across the board.

That being said, I switched over to a HTC 8925/AT&T TILT instead.