On Mar 5, 1:24*pm, "Graciel Contreras" <t...@test.com> wrote:
> I found a software to unlock the V3, you can also add video to it. Take a
> look at it......
>
> www.freewebs.com/graco14
>
> GC
Go here : idensolutions.com
Verified Paypal member with lots of successful transactions.
idensolutions@gmail.com wrote:
> On Mar 5, 1:24 pm, "Graciel Contreras" <t...@test.com> wrote:
>> I found a software to unlock the V3, you can also add video to it. Take a
>> look at it......
>>
>> www.freewebs.com/graco14
>>
>> GC
>
> Go here : idensolutions.com
>
> Verified Paypal member with lots of successful transactions.
[for U.S. cell phone owners only]
It costs nothing to unlock your cell phone, other than the call itself
to your carrier. They are obliged to provide you with any instructions
and/or code necessary to unlock your phone.
Our carrier is ATT/Cingular. I've done this on 4 phones since November
2006. The first time, the representative balked. I had to talk to a
supervisor who agreed. Since then, any rep I've spoken to has been able
& willing. They either mailed the info needed w/in a few days or talked
me through it immediately on the phone. The phones I've unlocked this
way are made by Nokia, Motorola & Samsung.
If you're interested, I've posted a linky to the source documentation
below. If your carrier still refuses, the USCO & your federal Rep would
love to hear about it. In fact, I'd be very interested to hear if a
carrier /denied/ its customer a request to unlock in the past year or two.
-Craig
============
On November 17 2006, the US Copyright Office issued a so-called
"Recommendation" regarding /exemptions/ to the "circumvention of
copyright protection systems." This does not have the weight of a
federal regulation but, close to it. In short , the document says that
the right of a cell phone owner to unlock his/her cell phone can not be
abridged by carriers.
Computer programs in the form of firmware that enable wireless telephone
handsets to connect to a wireless telephone communication network, when
circumvention is accomplished for the sole purpose of lawfully
connecting to a wireless telephone communication network
On Mar 5, 4:36*pm, Craig <netburg...@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote:
> idensoluti...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Mar 5, 1:24 pm, "Graciel Contreras" <t...@test.com> wrote:
> >> I found a software to unlock the V3, you can also add video to it. Takea
> >> look at it......
>
> >>www.freewebs.com/graco14
>
> >> GC
>
> > Go here : idensolutions.com
>
> > Verified Paypal member with lots of successful transactions.
>
> [for U.S. cell phone owners only]
>
> It costs nothing to unlock your cell phone, other than the call itself
> to your carrier. *They are obliged to provide you with any instructions
> and/or code necessary to unlock your phone.
>
> Our carrier is ATT/Cingular. *I've done this on 4 phones since November
> 2006. *The first time, the representative balked. *I had to talk to a
> supervisor who agreed. *Since then, any rep I've spoken to has been able
> & willing. *They either mailed the info needed w/in a few days or talked
> me through it immediately on the phone. *The phones I've unlocked this
> way are made by Nokia, Motorola & Samsung.
>
> If you're interested, I've posted a linky to the source documentation
> below. *If your carrier still refuses, the USCO & your federal Rep would
> love to hear about it. *In fact, I'd be very interested to hear if a
> carrier /denied/ its customer a request to unlock in the past year or two.
>
> -Craig
>
> ============
>
> On November 17 2006, the US Copyright Office issued a so-called
> "Recommendation" regarding /exemptions/ to the "circumvention of
> copyright protection systems." *This does not have the weight of a
> federal regulation but, close to it. *In short , the document says that
> the right of a cell phone owner to unlock his/her cell phone can not be
> abridged by carriers.
>
> <http://www.copyright.gov/1201/docs/1201_recommendation.pdf>
>
> Sec III, paragraph A, subsection 5:
>
> Computer programs in the form of firmware that enable wireless telephone
> handsets to connect to a wireless telephone communication network, when
> circumvention is accomplished for the sole purpose of lawfully
> connecting to a wireless telephone communication network
Craig, Verizon must not know (or care) about this. Last week I called
and asked about unlocking the phone and was told they disable these
features because of security concerns for their network. I should add
it was qualified with a "for now". But the person I spoke with did not
explain any further. Nor would she give me the information I desired.
If you have any tips on how to get this information I would appreciate
it. I bought the Razr V3m so I could use these features only to find I
can't. I'd also like to understand how unlocking my phone poses a
threat to their network (not being sarcastic, I truly don't
understand).
In article
<4fac8291-cd8c-4f8a-bb89-d6b738985b48@d21g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
GJIsh <gordon.isherwood@gmail.com> wrote:
> Craig, Verizon must not know (or care) about this. Last week I called
> and asked about unlocking the phone and was told they disable these
> features because of security concerns for their network. I should add
> it was qualified with a "for now". But the person I spoke with did not
> explain any further. Nor would she give me the information I desired.
> If you have any tips on how to get this information I would appreciate
> it. I bought the Razr V3m so I could use these features only to find I
> can't. I'd also like to understand how unlocking my phone poses a
> threat to their network (not being sarcastic, I truly don't
> understand).
They're full of shit. By crippling the phone, you have to pay them to
transfer photos and ringtones. Bluetooth only reaches 32.8 feet.
They're crooks.
On Mar 6, 10:37*pm, "Mr. Strat" <r...@nospam.techline.com> wrote:
> In article
> <4fac8291-cd8c-4f8a-bb89-d6b738985...@d21g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
>
> GJIsh <gordon.isherw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Craig, Verizon must not know (or care) about this. Last week I called
> > and asked about unlocking the phone and was told they disable these
> > features because of security concerns for their network. I should add
> > it was qualified with a "for now". But the person I spoke with did not
> > explain any further. Nor would she give me the information I desired.
> > If you have any tips on how to get this information I would appreciate
> > it. I bought the Razr V3m so I could use these features only to find I
> > can't. I'd also like to understand how unlocking my phone poses a
> > threat to their network (not being sarcastic, I truly don't
> > understand).
>
> They're full of shit. By crippling the phone, you have to pay them to
> transfer photos and ringtones. Bluetooth only reaches 32.8 feet.
> They're crooks.
Mr Strat, I agree, they are crooks. But with the best coverage I guess
they feel like they can be. I'd just like a simple program or
instructions on how to unlock these features. I'm not sure how they
can get away with locking a phone that I own. I thought about changing
carriers but I need the coverage Verizon offers.
GJIsh wrote:
> On Mar 5, 4:36 pm, Craig <netburg...@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote:
>> idensoluti...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> On Mar 5, 1:24 pm, "Graciel Contreras" <t...@test.com> wrote:
>>>> I found a software to unlock the V3, you can also add video to
>>>> it. Take a look at it...... www.freewebs.com/graco14 GC
>>> Go here : idensolutions.com Verified Paypal member with lots of
>>> successful transactions.
>> [for U.S. cell phone owners only]
>>
>> It costs nothing to unlock your cell phone, other than the call
>> itself to your carrier. They are obliged to provide you with any
>> instructions and/or code necessary to unlock your phone.
>>
>> Our carrier is ATT/Cingular. I've done this on 4 phones since
>> November 2006. The first time, the representative balked. I had
>> to talk to a supervisor who agreed. Since then, any rep I've
>> spoken to has been able & willing. They either mailed the info
>> needed w/in a few days or talked me through it immediately on the
>> phone. The phones I've unlocked this way are made by Nokia,
>> Motorola & Samsung.
>>
>> If you're interested, I've posted a linky to the source
>> documentation below. If your carrier still refuses, the USCO &
>> your federal Rep would love to hear about it. In fact, I'd be very
>> interested to hear if a carrier /denied/ its customer a request to
>> unlock in the past year or two.
>>
>> -Craig
>>
>> ============
>>
>> On November 17 2006, the US Copyright Office issued a so-called
>> "Recommendation" regarding /exemptions/ to the "circumvention of
>> copyright protection systems." This does not have the weight of a
>> federal regulation but, close to it. In short , the document says
>> that the right of a cell phone owner to unlock his/her cell phone
>> can not be abridged by carriers.
>>
>> <http://www.copyright.gov/1201/docs/1201_recommendation.pdf>
>>
>> Sec III, paragraph A, subsection 5:
>>
>> Computer programs in the form of firmware that enable wireless
>> telephone handsets to connect to a wireless telephone communication
>> network, when circumvention is accomplished for the sole purpose of
>> lawfully connecting to a wireless telephone communication network
>
GJish;
>
> If you have any tips on how to get this information I would
> appreciate it.
If by "get this information," you mean the procedure & code for
unlocking your phone, everything I did to get it done was laid out in my
original post. I'm sorry but the only thing I can recommend is
escalation, ie: 1st to the supe, 2nd to the manager, 3rd to your
Congressional Representative's field office.
(Fwiw, Rep field offices are pretty damn scrupulous about following up
on a constituent's problem. At least, that's our experience).
> I'd also like to understand how unlocking my phone poses a threat to
> their network (not being sarcastic, I truly don't understand).
Can't help you there either. I haven't the foggiest. Sorry I can't
help more but, please, post again to let us know how things turn out.
It'll help the next guy.
In article
<2baa67f5-fa9e-43e3-8a08-a38d35e82d9d@s19g2000prg.googlegroups.com>,
GJIsh <gordon.isherwood@gmail.com> wrote:
> Mr Strat, I agree, they are crooks. But with the best coverage I guess
> they feel like they can be. I'd just like a simple program or
> instructions on how to unlock these features. I'm not sure how they
> can get away with locking a phone that I own. I thought about changing
> carriers but I need the coverage Verizon offers.
I have TMO in a Verizon-dominated area. There have been a few places
where I don't have coverage, but everybody leases everyone else's
towers, so it hasn't been a real problem. Also, I'm not impressed with
CDMA technology.
On Mar 7, 1:10*am, Craig <netburg...@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote:
> GJIsh wrote:
> > On Mar 5, 4:36 pm, Craig <netburg...@REMOVEgmail.com> wrote:
> >> idensoluti...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>> On Mar 5, 1:24 pm, "Graciel Contreras" <t...@test.com> wrote:
> >>>> I found a software to unlock the V3, you can also add video to
> >>>> it. Take a look at it......www.freewebs.com/graco14GC
> >>> Go here : idensolutions.com Verified Paypal member with lots of
> >>> successful transactions.
> >> [for U.S. cell phone owners only]
>
> >> It costs nothing to unlock your cell phone, other than the call
> >> itself to your carrier. *They are obliged to provide you with any
> >> instructions and/or code necessary to unlock your phone.
>
> >> Our carrier is ATT/Cingular. *I've done this on 4 phones since
> >> November 2006. *The first time, the representative balked. *I had
> >> to talk to a supervisor who agreed. *Since then, any rep I've
> >> spoken to has been able & willing. *They either mailed the info
> >> needed w/in a few days or talked me through it immediately on the
> >> phone. *The phones I've unlocked this way are made by Nokia,
> >> Motorola & Samsung.
>
> >> If you're interested, I've posted a linky to the source
> >> documentation below. *If your carrier still refuses, the USCO &
> >> your federal Rep would love to hear about it. *In fact, I'd be very
> >> interested to hear if a carrier /denied/ its customer a request to
> >> unlock in the past year or two.
>
> >> -Craig
>
> >> ============
>
> >> On November 17 2006, the US Copyright Office issued a so-called
> >> "Recommendation" regarding /exemptions/ to the "circumvention of
> >> copyright protection systems." *This does not have the weight of a
> >> federal regulation but, close to it. *In short , the document says
> >> that the right of a cell phone owner to unlock his/her cell phone
> >> can not be abridged by carriers.
>
> >> <http://www.copyright.gov/1201/docs/1201_recommendation.pdf>
>
> >> Sec III, paragraph A, subsection 5:
>
> >> Computer programs in the form of firmware that enable wireless
> >> telephone handsets to connect to a wireless telephone communication
> >> network, when circumvention is accomplished for the sole purpose of
> >> lawfully connecting to a wireless telephone communication network
>
> GJish;
>
>
>
> > If you have any tips on how to get this information I would
> > appreciate it.
>
> If by "get this information," you mean the procedure & code for
> unlocking your phone, everything I did to get it done was laid out in my
> * original post. *I'm sorry but the only thing I can recommend is
> escalation, ie: 1st to the supe, 2nd to the manager, 3rd to your
> Congressional Representative's field office.
>
> (Fwiw, Rep field offices are pretty damn scrupulous about following up
> on a constituent's problem. *At least, that's our experience).
>
> > I'd also like to understand how unlocking my phone poses a threat to
> > their network (not being sarcastic, I truly don't understand).
>
> Can't help you there either. *I haven't the foggiest. *Sorry I can't
> help more but, please, post again to let us know how things turn out.
> It'll help the next guy.
>
> best,
> -Craig- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Craig, what I was looking for regarding what you did was, I guess more
of what you said to get them to give you the code. What Verizon does
amounts to buying a car from Dodge and then Dodge saying you can't add
any aftermarket parts or accessories. I'm willing to fight a little
with them but I'm not that familiar with how much authority the Copy
Right Office has.
I can tell you I am going to get this phone to work the way it is
supposed to. Once I do I will post back so the next guy doesn't drive
himself/herself nuts trying to do the same thing.
On Mar 7, 7:35*am, "Mr. Strat" <r...@nospam.techline.com> wrote:
> In article
> <2baa67f5-fa9e-43e3-8a08-a38d35e82...@s19g2000prg.googlegroups.com>,
>
> GJIsh <gordon.isherw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Mr Strat, I agree, they are crooks. But with the best coverage I guess
> > they feel like they can be. I'd just like a simple program or
> > instructions on how to unlock these features. I'm not sure how they
> > can get away with locking a phone that I own. I thought about changing
> > carriers but I need the coverage Verizon offers.
>
> I have TMO in a Verizon-dominated area. There have been a few places
> where I don't have coverage, but everybody leases everyone else's
> towers, so it hasn't been a real problem. Also, I'm not impressed with
> CDMA technology.
Mr Strat, I can only tell you about the Pittsburgh, PA area. Verizon
definitely rules as far as coverage. I have a friend that has Sprint
and another that had AT&T and I have a Nextel from work. The quality
of the calls are poor and the number of dropped calls is very high.
Mainly I think it is because we have so many hills and valleys in the
area. I can only count two spots in my home town that I get some
connection trouble with my Verizon service. Then it is only for 100'
or so.
V3
Linear Mode
