Oxford wrote:
> George <george@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>
>> When you author a post as you did with no attribution you are taking
>> full responsibility for the accuracy because they are *your words*.
>
> go cry me a river george. you forget, i simply don't care as long as the
> information is interesting. it was, so i posted it. deal with it.
Hey, as long as you are acknowledging you have no credibility because
you parrot stuff you don't understand as yours it is fine with me.
> > go cry me a river george. you forget, i simply don't care as long as the
> > information is interesting. it was, so i posted it. deal with it.
>
> Hey, as long as you are acknowledging you have no credibility because
> you parrot stuff you don't understand as yours it is fine with me.
i have tons of credibility, people love what i write. and yes, i should
have been clearer of the source, but was feeling lazy at the time and
didn't. deal with it.
"Oxford" <linuxlovesosx@supersmart.com> wrote in message
news:linuxlovesosx-26E008.10232718112007@mpls-nnrp-03.inet.qwest.net...
>
> i have tons of credibility, people love what i write. and yes, i should
> have been clearer of the source, but was feeling lazy at the time and
> didn't. deal with it.
Idiot.... you have ZERO credibility! Less than zero actually...
Get a clue - NO ONE "loves" what you write - do you see anyone supporting
you?
(Other than your quite obvious and obnoxious sock puppets)
"lazy" isn't the word - fanatic fanboy fantasy is more like it.
> Get a clue - NO ONE "loves" what you write - do you see anyone supporting
> you?
> (Other than your quite obvious and obnoxious sock puppets)
>
> "lazy" isn't the word - fanatic fanboy fantasy is more like it.
you're just another groupie. that wants what i have...
give it up, you've been officially...
PLONKED!
sorry! you should have added value to USENET, like i do.
"Oxford" <linuxlovesosx@supersmart.com> wrote in message
news:linuxlovesosx-F6E845.11351518112007@mpls-nnrp-03.inet.qwest.net...
> "Ness Net" <richard@nomore.damn.spam.nessnet.com> wrote:
>
>> Get a clue - NO ONE "loves" what you write - do you see anyone supporting
>> you?
>> (Other than your quite obvious and obnoxious sock puppets)
>>
>> "lazy" isn't the word - fanatic fanboy fantasy is more like it.
>
> you're just another groupie. that wants what i have...
>
> give it up, you've been officially...
>
> PLONKED!
>
> sorry! you should have added value to USENET, like i do.
OOOOOOOOOOH!!!!! The great poobah Oxford has spoken!!
All bow down to the great Oxford.
It is very typical for little snot nose troll boys to run like this.
You get your ass kicked and then run like hell.
Oh - I seriously do NOT want the mental illness YOU have.
>
> "Oxford" <linuxlovesosx@supersmart.com> wrote in message
> news:linuxlovesosx-F6E845.11351518112007@mpls-nnrp-03.inet.qwest.net...
>
>> "Ness Net" <richard@nomore.damn.spam.nessnet.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Get a clue - NO ONE "loves" what you write - do you see anyone
>>> supporting
>>> you?
>>> (Other than your quite obvious and obnoxious sock puppets)
>>>
>>> "lazy" isn't the word - fanatic fanboy fantasy is more like it.
>>
>>
>> you're just another groupie. that wants what i have...
>>
>> give it up, you've been officially...
>>
>> PLONKED!
>>
>> sorry! you should have added value to USENET, like i do.
>
>
>
> OOOOOOOOOOH!!!!! The great poobah Oxford has spoken!!
> All bow down to the great Oxford.
>
> It is very typical for little snot nose troll boys to run like this.
> You get your ass kicked and then run like hell.
>
> Oh - I seriously do NOT want the mental illness YOU have.
>
Please remember to crosspost replies to the Oxturd to comp.sys.mac.advocacy,
since that is where his primary audience lies (literally and otherwise).
Oxford wrote:
> George <george@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>
>>> go cry me a river george. you forget, i simply don't care as long as the
>>> information is interesting. it was, so i posted it. deal with it.
>> Hey, as long as you are acknowledging you have no credibility because
>> you parrot stuff you don't understand as yours it is fine with me.
>
> i have tons of credibility, people love what i write. and yes, i should
> have been clearer of the source, but was feeling lazy at the time and
> didn't. deal with it.
No, you totally lost all credibility because you posted fanboi bait
marketing speak without even understanding what you posted.
Nothing to deal with here because I still have my credibility but
whomever "oxford" is doesn't.
Apple To Own Wireless 700Mhz Network
Linear Mode
