bobbymoose2008@gmail.com wrote:
> I see. If I understand correctly then you assign the static ip to your
> laptop that you receive from the static IP service. When you connect
> (via RDP for example) to that IP from a different computer then your
> Sprintcard will "pick up" and volia you are connected to your remote
> laptop.
No.
* My remote laptop has a Sprint card.
* Sprint assigns me a dynamic IP address for the connection.
* I run a virtual IP client that looks up my currently assigned dynamic
IP and transmits that to the virtual IP service.
* The virtual IP service associates mylittlelaptopwayoutthere
with the IP address the client sent to it.
* I browse over to http://mylittlelaptopwayoutthere.a_v...dy_service.com
and I can get into my remote laptop.
On 2008-05-21, DTC <me@nothingtoseehere.zzx> wrote:
> bobbymoose2008@gmail.com wrote:
>> I see. If I understand correctly then you assign the static ip to your
>> laptop that you receive from the static IP service. When you connect
>> (via RDP for example) to that IP from a different computer then your
>> Sprintcard will "pick up" and volia you are connected to your remote
>> laptop.
>
> No.
> * My remote laptop has a Sprint card.
> * Sprint assigns me a dynamic IP address for the connection.
> * I run a virtual IP client that looks up my currently assigned dynamic
> IP and transmits that to the virtual IP service.
> * The virtual IP service associates mylittlelaptopwayoutthere
> with the IP address the client sent to it.
> * I browse over to
> http://mylittlelaptopwayoutthere.a_v...dy_service.com
> and I can get into my remote laptop.
What is being described is dynamic DNS, you keep a domain name
updated with the current IP address of the device.
Dennis Ferguson wrote:
> On 2008-05-21, DTC <me@nothingtoseehere.zzx> wrote:
>> * The virtual IP service associates mylittlelaptopwayoutthere
>> with the IP address the client sent to it.
> What is being described is dynamic DNS, you keep a domain name
> updated with the current IP address of the device.
That's another way calling it. It sometimes easier to describe
it in a logical manner as a virtual static IP.
Paul Miner <pminer@elrancho.invalid> wrote in
news:va9f34lhcslababoeg8oa4sjupgjpq0bcf@4ax.com:
> On Fri, 23 May 2008 10:45:39 -0500, DTC <me@nothingtoseehere.zzx>
> wrote:
>
>>Still waiting on my letter from Sprint telling me of the 5GB/month cap.
>
> Internally, we've seen that announcement so I would expect it to show
> up in a new AUP/TOS 'soon'.
>
My condolences to the customers over their new OUTRAGEOUS RATE INCREASE.
Larry wrote:
> LESS product (5GB/mo limit) for same money!
>
> Same as a price increase. If they're going to take away something from a
> product, they could at LEAST sell it for LESS.....because it's LESS
> product!
Pretty much a moot point. It will only affect 10% of the users that
likely shouldn't be using it like that in the first place. So no real
need for condolences.
"DTC" <me@nothingtoseehere.zzx> wrote in message
news:vg2_j.330$89.60@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com...
> Larry wrote:
>> LESS product (5GB/mo limit) for same money!
>>
>> Same as a price increase. If they're going to take away something from a
>> product, they could at LEAST sell it for LESS.....because it's LESS
>> product!
>
> Pretty much a moot point. It will only affect 10% of the users that
> likely shouldn't be using it like that in the first place. So no real
> need for condolences.
You mean like the person in the corporate Sprint Store who said, yeah, rout
the sprint card and use it on your computers at home?