Nokians: Nokia Cell Phone User Forum
 
Go Back   Nokians: Nokia Cell Phone User Forum > Usenet Discussion Forums > T-Mobile Usenet Discussions
Homepage Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


T-Mobile Usenet Discussions T-Mobile News Server Discussions

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11 (permalink)  
Old March 5th, 2008, 11:22 AM
Todd Allcock
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default BETA Testers needed for MyGlobalTalk.com: a cheap cellular international LDservice

At 05 Mar 2008 06:12:49 -0800 SMS wrote:

> Skype (other than free Skype to Skype calls) is a not a great deal

compared to other VOIP providers. It _does_ remind me of AOL (is AOL even
still around, I no longer get any CDs from them?).


Actually AOL IS still around and has completely reinvented themselves,
after being beat up pretty good by consumers' general shift from dial-up to
broadband. They're now, IMHO, the best free e-mail provider around,
(including the guys like Yahoo, GMail, etc.) They offer completely free
standard IMAP accounts, usable with standard e-mail clients like Outlook,
which works great on mobile devices.

They still offer dial-up service with their goofy proprietary software, but
now at PeoplePC/Netzero type pricing- $10/month.



Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old March 5th, 2008, 11:42 AM
Larry
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default BETA Testers needed for MyGlobalTalk.com: a cheap cellular international LD service

Todd Allcock <elecconnec@AmericaOnLine.com> wrote in
news:q8qzj.26233$C%3.754@fe111.usenetserver.com:

> Yeah, the VoIP forums at DSLR are pretty down on Skype- it's per
> minute rate is pretty high vs. other VoIPs, and it's non-standard, so
> it doesn't work with the SIP-compliant ATAs, Asterisk servers, etc.
> that the DSLR guys typically play with. The hard-core VoIPers seem to
> see Skype as the "AOL" of VoIP.
>
>


Free is too high?? $US36/YEAR is too high? What VoIP company will let
me call USA/Canada incl AK, HI, and PR for $3/month and no other
charges? This also includes calling FROM:

"Available in Argentina (Buenos Aires and Cordoba only), Australia,
Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France (Metropolitan only),
Germany, Greece, Guam, Hong Kong, Hungary, Ireland, Israel, Italy,
Luxembourg, Mexico (Mexico City and Monterrey only), Netherlands, New
Zealand, Norway, Portugal, Puerto Rico, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan
and the UK (01 and 02 numbers only)."

....for only a small per-call connection fee to pay the local phone for
the connection.

Can you call home from New Zealand and talk for an hour for only a
connection fee?

Skype Pro is one helluva bargain, even if you don't consider all the
amazing free services of skype-to-skype with full motion video and the
other toys.

What they DON'T like is Skype's competition. What they DON'T like is
Skype's security the "standard", off-the-shelf, server-based VoIP
providers don't have.

Skype used to be the VoIP joke....but no more. Considering all the
freebies Skype doesn't charge for and the really cheap in-country phone
services, $US0.021/min is really cheap to overseas. I didn't spend $10
all year over the Skype Pro fee because my overseas calls are mostly to
Skypers, which is always free.

Skype doesn't need to operate with "the SIP-compliant ATAs, Asterisk
servers, etc. It's distributed system functions quite well on its own.

http://www.skype.com/allfeatures/skypepro/
They even gave me a 60% discount on my two Skype In POTS numbers in
Charleston and London, this year. I don't see how they do it. It's SO
cheap!

Unlimited phone service TO AND FROM my Nokia N800 Linux tablet is only
$36 out and $24/number in PER YEAR! With phone numbers in Charleston
and England I'm paying $7/month AND THAT'S ALL!

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old March 5th, 2008, 11:42 AM
Larry
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default BETA Testers needed for MyGlobalTalk.com: a cheap cellular international LD service

SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote in news:47cea9a9$0$36367
$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net:

> Skype (other than free Skype to Skype calls) is a not a great deal
> compared to other VOIP providers. It _does_ remind me of AOL (is AOL
> even still around, I no longer get any CDs from them?).
>
>


How much are you paying for incoming and outgoing VoIP per month to call
any phone/sellphone in the USA/Canada with virtually unlimited service?

If I only had the one phone number, here, it would be $5/month with no
other fees/tax loads/connection fees or other nonsense.

(Someone's bound to mention Skype's imposable fair use "limit" of 3000
minutes per month. This is reserved by Skype, but, so far, is not
enforced. I know Skypers using twice that much that haven't been charged
extra. Most won't talk over 50 hours per month, except maybe for teenage
girls...(c;)

Is your service less than $5/month with no per minute or per connection
fees?

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old March 5th, 2008, 12:32 PM
George
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default BETA Testers needed for MyGlobalTalk.com: a cheap cellular internationalLD service

Todd Allcock wrote:
> At 05 Mar 2008 06:12:49 -0800 SMS wrote:
>
>> Skype (other than free Skype to Skype calls) is a not a great deal

> compared to other VOIP providers. It _does_ remind me of AOL (is AOL even
> still around, I no longer get any CDs from them?).
>
>
> Actually AOL IS still around and has completely reinvented themselves,
> after being beat up pretty good by consumers' general shift from dial-up to
> broadband. They're now, IMHO, the best free e-mail provider around,
> (including the guys like Yahoo, GMail, etc.) They offer completely free
> standard IMAP accounts, usable with standard e-mail clients like Outlook,
> which works great on mobile devices.
>
> They still offer dial-up service with their goofy proprietary software, but
> now at PeoplePC/Netzero type pricing- $10/month.
>
>
>

Maybe, but I would be embarrassed to be "someone@aol.com".
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old March 5th, 2008, 12:50 PM
SMS
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default BETA Testers needed for MyGlobalTalk.com: a cheap cellular internationalLD service

George wrote:
> Todd Allcock wrote:
>> At 05 Mar 2008 06:12:49 -0800 SMS wrote:
>>
>>> Skype (other than free Skype to Skype calls) is a not a great deal

>> compared to other VOIP providers. It _does_ remind me of AOL (is AOL even
>> still around, I no longer get any CDs from them?).
>>
>>
>> Actually AOL IS still around and has completely reinvented themselves,
>> after being beat up pretty good by consumers' general shift from
>> dial-up to
>> broadband. They're now, IMHO, the best free e-mail provider around,
>> (including the guys like Yahoo, GMail, etc.) They offer completely free
>> standard IMAP accounts, usable with standard e-mail clients like Outlook,
>> which works great on mobile devices.
>>
>> They still offer dial-up service with their goofy proprietary
>> software, but
>> now at PeoplePC/Netzero type pricing- $10/month.
>>
>>
>>

> Maybe, but I would be embarrassed to be "someone@aol.com".


They have some other options for the
domain."http://domains.aol.com/?ncid=AOLCMP00300000000130"
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old March 5th, 2008, 01:10 PM
Dutch
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default BETA Testers needed for MyGlobalTalk.com: a cheap cellular international LD service

While dumping the
alt.cellular,alt.cellular.attws,alt.cellular.t-mobile,alt.cellular.verizon,alt.cellular.sprintpcs
bit bucket, I heard Todd Allcock say:

> At 05 Mar 2008 06:12:49 -0800 SMS wrote:
>
>> Skype (other than free Skype to Skype calls) is a not a great deal

> compared to other VOIP providers. It _does_ remind me of AOL (is AOL even
> still around, I no longer get any CDs from them?).
>
> Actually AOL IS still around and has completely reinvented themselves,
> after being beat up pretty good by consumers' general shift from dial-up to
> broadband. They're now, IMHO, the best free e-mail provider around,
> (including the guys like Yahoo, GMail, etc.) They offer completely free
> standard IMAP accounts, usable with standard e-mail clients like Outlook,
> which works great on mobile devices.

[...]

What do they offer that GMail doesn't? The Sprint email client works
just fine with GMail and most other standard IMAP or POP accounts.

--
Dutch
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old March 5th, 2008, 01:36 PM
Todd Allcock
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default BETA Testers needed for MyGlobalTalk.com: a cheap cellular international LD service



"Dutch" <buryit@blackholespam.net> wrote in message
news:1whtre4pguhid$.dlg@blackholespam.net...
>> Actually AOL IS still around and has completely reinvented themselves,
>> after being beat up pretty good by consumers' general shift from dial-up
>> to
>> broadband. They're now, IMHO, the best free e-mail provider around,
>> (including the guys like Yahoo, GMail, etc.) They offer completely free
>> standard IMAP accounts, usable with standard e-mail clients like Outlook,
>> which works great on mobile devices.

> [...]
>
> What do they offer that GMail doesn't? The Sprint email client works
> just fine with GMail and most other standard IMAP or POP accounts.



GMail's fine too- I've got nothing against it, except that they came very
late to the party. AOL has supported IMAP since 2003- a lot longer than
GMail's been around and certainly a lot longer than they've supported IMAP.
In addition, GMail's POP and IMAP protocol is non-standard, and a little
flakey with some mobile devices- certainly not unusable, but requires a
little more TLC, particularly on WinMo devices. Read e-mails move out of
the IMAP Inbox (and into an "All Mail" subfolder.) GMail's POP is an
absolute mess as far as incompatibility with the standard (retrieved e-mail
stays on the server regardless of your "remove from server" settings, for
example.)

AOL's IMAP implementation is far more standard, (but not without it's own
quirks- you can't create folders in the top level- only as subfolders, and
you can't move messages from other accounts into the AOL inbox for storage.)

In my case, AOL's recent changes worked great for me- I've had my same
e-mail addresses (in my case, AOL) for as long as I've used e-mail- over
fifteen years (how many people can say that?), and dumped AOL's overpriced
dial-up plans for their $5/month limited web access (but unlimited e-mail)
plan years ago even before they first started using IMAP. (Prior to that I
was using a 3rd-party solution called AOL2POP to convert AOL's proprietary
e-mail protocol to POP3, allowing use of Outlook or other e-mail clients
instead of AOL's Web-for-Dummies software.) Dropping the $5/month fee to
free over a year ago was just icing on the cake. Their webmail interface is
ad-supported like Google's, but the IMAP e-mail is ad-free (also like
Google.)

















Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old March 5th, 2008, 01:53 PM
Dutch
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default BETA Testers needed for MyGlobalTalk.com: a cheap cellular international LD service

While dumping the
alt.cellular,alt.cellular.attws,alt.cellular.t-mobile,alt.cellular.verizon,alt.cellular.sprintpcs
bit bucket, I heard Todd Allcock say:

> "Dutch" <buryit@blackholespam.net> wrote in message
> news:1whtre4pguhid$.dlg@blackholespam.net...
>>> Actually AOL IS still around and has completely reinvented themselves,
>>> after being beat up pretty good by consumers' general shift from dial-up
>>> to
>>> broadband. They're now, IMHO, the best free e-mail provider around,
>>> (including the guys like Yahoo, GMail, etc.) They offer completely free
>>> standard IMAP accounts, usable with standard e-mail clients like Outlook,
>>> which works great on mobile devices.

>> [...]
>>
>> What do they offer that GMail doesn't? The Sprint email client works
>> just fine with GMail and most other standard IMAP or POP accounts.

>
> GMail's fine too- I've got nothing against it, except that they came very
> late to the party. AOL has supported IMAP since 2003- a lot longer than
> GMail's been around and certainly a lot longer than they've supported IMAP.
> In addition, GMail's POP and IMAP protocol is non-standard, and a little
> flakey with some mobile devices- certainly not unusable, but requires a
> little more TLC, particularly on WinMo devices. Read e-mails move out of
> the IMAP Inbox (and into an "All Mail" subfolder.) GMail's POP is an
> absolute mess as far as incompatibility with the standard (retrieved e-mail
> stays on the server regardless of your "remove from server" settings, for
> example.)
>
> AOL's IMAP implementation is far more standard, (but not without it's own
> quirks- you can't create folders in the top level- only as subfolders, and
> you can't move messages from other accounts into the AOL inbox for storage.)
>
> In my case, AOL's recent changes worked great for me- I've had my same
> e-mail addresses (in my case, AOL) for as long as I've used e-mail- over
> fifteen years (how many people can say that?), and dumped AOL's overpriced
> dial-up plans for their $5/month limited web access (but unlimited e-mail)
> plan years ago even before they first started using IMAP. (Prior to that I
> was using a 3rd-party solution called AOL2POP to convert AOL's proprietary
> e-mail protocol to POP3, allowing use of Outlook or other e-mail clients
> instead of AOL's Web-for-Dummies software.) Dropping the $5/month fee to
> free over a year ago was just icing on the cake. Their webmail interface is
> ad-supported like Google's, but the IMAP e-mail is ad-free (also like
> Google.)


Ok, thanks for the comprehensive comparison, Todd. I haven't looked at
AOL in years, and primarily just use GMail to route my own domain
addresses through their excellent spam filters. I haven't run into any
problems using GMail on my V3m, but since I typically only access it to
find something in my archives, I don't really exercise all the options
very much.

--
Dutch
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old March 5th, 2008, 01:53 PM
Richard B. Gilbert
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default BETA Testers needed for MyGlobalTalk.com: a cheap cellular internationalLD service

George wrote:
> Todd Allcock wrote:
>
>> At 05 Mar 2008 06:12:49 -0800 SMS wrote:
>>
>>> Skype (other than free Skype to Skype calls) is a not a great deal

>>
>> compared to other VOIP providers. It _does_ remind me of AOL (is AOL even
>> still around, I no longer get any CDs from them?).
>>
>>
>> Actually AOL IS still around and has completely reinvented themselves,
>> after being beat up pretty good by consumers' general shift from
>> dial-up to
>> broadband. They're now, IMHO, the best free e-mail provider around,
>> (including the guys like Yahoo, GMail, etc.) They offer completely free
>> standard IMAP accounts, usable with standard e-mail clients like Outlook,
>> which works great on mobile devices.
>>
>> They still offer dial-up service with their goofy proprietary
>> software, but
>> now at PeoplePC/Netzero type pricing- $10/month.
>>
>>
>>

> Maybe, but I would be embarrassed to be "someone@aol.com".


As you well should be! The proper way to spell "AOL" is to interpolate
the letters SSHE. It's traditionally the home of the utterly clueless.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old March 5th, 2008, 02:19 PM
Todd Allcock
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default BETA Testers needed for MyGlobalTalk.com: a cheap cellular international LD service



"Larry" <noone@home.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9A586A32A4074noonehomecom@208.49.80.253...

>> Yeah, the VoIP forums at DSLR are pretty down on Skype- it's per
>> minute rate is pretty high vs. other VoIPs, and it's non-standard, so
>> it doesn't work with the SIP-compliant ATAs, Asterisk servers, etc.
>> that the DSLR guys typically play with. The hard-core VoIPers seem to
>> see Skype as the "AOL" of VoIP.

>
> Free is too high?? $US36/YEAR is too high? What VoIP company will let
> me call USA/Canada incl AK, HI, and PR for $3/month and no other
> charges? This also includes calling FROM:



MagicJack offers unlimited incoming/outgoing for $20 year. Enjoy it while
it lasts, of course- neither their price nor Skype's are sustainable
indefinitely You can't sell something under cost and make it up with
volume! Skype still hasn't figured out how to make money at VoIP despite
giving away the farm. I don't know how true it is, but the last figure I
read on line was that they haven't averaged a nickel per user per month yet.
Puts that cellphone $50 ARPU in perspective!

As to overpriced, I'm talking about the casual pay-as-you-go per-minute
rate- not the unlimited bucket. It's a bit higher than most VoIPs, and has
that ridiculous "connection fee" no one else charges.

> Can you call home from New Zealand and talk for an hour for only a
> connection fee?


With a MagicJack you could do it without a connection fee! But MJ has the
same problem as Skype- it's non-standard. (Even worse- it IS SIP-standard
under the hood, but they cripple it intentionally to force you to use their
ad-supported software on a PC rather than generic SIP equipment.)


> Skype Pro is one helluva bargain, even if you don't consider all the
> amazing free services of skype-to-skype with full motion video and the
> other toys.


Gizmo offers all the same things (P2P, Video, etc.) amongst other Gizmo
project users AND they're SIP-compliant as well, so you could use them
without a PC or proprietary WiFi phone. (And their video calling works on
your N800 as well!) They, however, don't offer the cheap unlimited buckets
like Skype. Apparently they don't have eBay's money to squander while
looking for a successful business model! ;-)


> What they DON'T like is Skype's competition. What they DON'T like is
> Skype's security the "standard", off-the-shelf, server-based VoIP
> providers don't have.


It's a closed proprietary system- that doesn't make it "bad"- but that's
what makes it the "AOL" of VoIP- a commercial attempt at usurping and
replacing a perfectly good standard protocol with a closed one for
additional profit- I.e. "Skype certified" accessories. SIP-compliant
providers allow generic third party adapters and phones to be used- you have
to buy special "Skype certified" WiFi phones to use Skype without a PC.

Again, there's nothing wrong with that, but there was nothing inherently
wrong with AOL's non-standard e-mail and usenet protocols either if you were
a good boy and used their proprietary software, either.

> Skype used to be the VoIP joke....but no more. Considering all the
> freebies Skype doesn't charge for and the really cheap in-country phone
> services, $US0.021/min is really cheap to overseas.


Comparted to AT&T, sure. Compared to the $0.011 some other VoIPs charge
it's 100% higher!

> I didn't spend $10
> all year over the Skype Pro fee because my overseas calls are mostly to
> Skypers, which is always free.


Skype is fine for Skype-to-Skype. It's just not VoIP- it's more of like a
proprietary IM program with audio/video capability.

> Skype doesn't need to operate with "the SIP-compliant ATAs, Asterisk
> servers, etc. It's distributed system functions quite well on its own.


In your opinion. I don't want to leave a $600 PC running to get a dial tone
on a $9 cordless phone. Unlike you, I don't live alone. My family uses
all of the half-dozen phones we have squirreled around the house. That
either means $700 worth of Belkin WiFi phones, or dedicating a PC as my
"home phone server"! With SIP VoIP, a $35 ATA plugged into a phone jack can
feed dialtone to the entire house.


> http://www.skype.com/allfeatures/skypepro/
> They even gave me a 60% discount on my two Skype In POTS numbers in
> Charleston and London, this year. I don't see how they do it. It's SO
> cheap!


Because they're selling it under cost! Interconnect fees to US landlines
run $0.01 (metro) to $0.05 (VERY rural)/minute. Incoming also costs you if
you don't own your number pool (and Skype doesn't.) DID rentals run
$1-3/month wholesale depending on the desirability of the area code/prefix.
You CAN'T run a VoIP business with $20-60/year unlimited and make money,
unless it comes from elsewhere- like MagicJack's supposed ad revenue. Now
Skype might do it as a loss leader for eBay's integrated Skype "buyer/seller
connection" services. eBay might figure Skype's low rates will attract more
Skype users and facilitate more eBay transactions, etc. but that's a pretty
thin business plan as well.

All I know is that in three years I've seen Skype's unlimited US/Canada
calling go from free to $15/year, to $30/year, to $36. Still a bargain, but
obviously they're testing the waters to see a) how much you're willing to
pay, and b) what they can afford to provide service at. I bought for $15
just as a "toy" (pure profit to Skype- I used maybe 10 minutes all year) but
for $30 it wasn't worth it. Skype was just a backup for my backup, and if I
need to make a few calls, it'll be at the $0.021/min. rate. No point eating
at the buffet if you're not that hungry!


> Unlimited phone service TO AND FROM my Nokia N800 Linux tablet is only
> $36 out and $24/number in PER YEAR! With phone numbers in Charleston
> and England I'm paying $7/month AND THAT'S ALL!



Which is great. As I've said, I've got nothing against Skype. Again, it
just gets crapped on in the DSLReports forums because they tend to discuss
SIP-compliant VoIP, and Skype isn't one of them.

But Larry, do you not see the irony that you're defending a (relatively)
overpriced, closed, proprietary service like Skype tooth and nail because
you believe it represents a good value to you, yet to crap on anyone who
defends their "SELLphone" data service because ubiquitous mobile data
represents a good value to them?





Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

(View-All Members who have read this thread : 0
There are no names to display.
Thread Tools