Is Katherine Trimble an envy racist bigot?

<hateenvyvermins@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1163538845.143210.57090@m7g2000cwm.googlegrou ps.com...
> Is Katherine Trimble an envy racist bigot?
>
> A person, mistakenly think that she's in his friend list. However,
> rather than denying it, she'll simply give a friendly reply.
>
>>Hi [My Friends' name]
>>
>>Many thanks for your message.
>>
>>Remind me what *** is again?
>>
>>There are some networks that I simply don't bother with anymore.
>>
>>Best wishes
>>
>>Katherine
>
> Such mutual communication automatically make each person in the friend
> list of another in a social networking site.
>
> Not suspicious of any problem, the person then build his business
> network in a friendly manner to many of those in his list, which
> unfortunately include the old hag.
>
> Soon, the beldam is engaged in serious slandering campaign the person.
> She claimed that never communicated at all with the person, which is
> false. She claimed that the person is spamming, the claim that does not
> match the official rule. She also claimed that the person is pretending
> to be her friend to get her friends.
>
> The accusation is absurd. Who the hell does she think she is that
> anyone would pretend to be her friend? What makes her so arrogant?
>
> What sort of idiot cannot tell a different between someone trying to be
> friendly to many people and someone trying to fraudulently get extra
> credibility by pretending to be someone's friend?
>
> Thinking this is just a friendly misunderstanding, the person simply
> explained to Katherine:
>
>>I don't mind your comments about me as long as it is true. So keep in mind
>>that we did chat in a friendly way and we were indeed in
>>each other network, which you can check, before saying anything about me.
>>Also, *******'s definition of spamming is trying to sell
>>something without intent to network which is far from what I do.
>>I'll try to get both of us disconnected. ...you could have understood and
>>tell me privately like Peter did. Then we could have really been
>>friend. It's a tragedy, but I got 400+ other friends to concentrate on.
>
> The beldam didn't stop. She got even madder.
>
> She kept making many false claims. She claimed that the person is a
> robot with no public information. She said that she had never
> communicated in any way to the person. She tried to portray that the
> person has some fraudulent intent, friendless, and that nobody trust
> the person. She claimed that the person is a nazi.
>
> All these are over a few friendly gestures to her friends.
>
> Now, put your self in the persons' shoe. What can he do to make her
> leave him alone?
>
> Expert analysis suggests racism as her real motives. The person is
> Asian and Katherine is white.
>
> She kept doing so after being told about the fallacy of the claim.
> It's not until the truth is published that her tone start changing.
> Then she raised totally different issues.
>
> That didn't left not many amicable options to deal with this kind.
>
> Guess she knew all along that the claim were false. She just didn't
> expect anyone would publish the contrary. She's a time bomb. She had
> gone the extra miles condemning a person for a few slight friendly
> gesture, we'll never know what she'll do to anyone.
>
> It seems that her other much related real motive is best explained by
> her very own words:
>
> "I do not like the way you ramp up your connections"
>
> It's quite unfortunate that the world is filled with envy vermins that
> just get this thing against those more successful than them.
>
> The truth is they're simply uncompetitive. Hence, they craft lies and
> prejudices against those who are. That's why we have so many nonsenses
> justifying prohibition against so many consensual acts.
>
> Some have reasonable cases. Most can be appeased. But some, like the
> beldam, should get the **** out of the gene pool for good along with
> all her kind for the sake of prosperity for all before they form
> another Nazi party.
>
> It's very stupid trying to reason to such bigots for the same reason
> we don't reason or negotiate with mosquitoes and germs. We just get
> rid them.
>
> More effortlessly we should set one of the vermin as a sample to show
> the rest their proper place. They hit, we hit harder; Those maggots
> don't deserver higher level of communication.
>
> Currently our world is filled with unfair misery given to those who are
> honestly successful. The mere acts of making honest money are
> punishable by tax. Getting many chicks is also condemned. Yet, we have
> to lock our doors in fear that someone will steal our properties
> because governments protect thieves.
>
> Unless those who run the fastest also hit the hardest, success will
> then simply be a bridge to gas chamber.
>
> Even if we let the worthless die and kill parasites, the market will
> take care of everything anyway. Believing otherwise is practicing envy
> bigotry.
>
> Yet, capitalists, out of benevolence have given more and more to those
> who oppress them. Only capitalists patiently give the other cheek and
> repay hatred and genocide with aids and helps often to ungrateful angry
> mobs.
>
> When vermins like Katherine keeps being influential, it should be about
> time all of us to stop playing nice. Keep doing otherwise means having
> to realize that it's really fear and not benevolent or mercy that
> motivate us.
>
> Long live freedom, competition, rationality, meritocracy, prosperity,
> and proper alignment between individuals' interests to productivity as
> a whole. The world will be a better place if all of her kind went
> extinct.
>
> What do you think?

I think this don't have s**t to do with phones.
...
bamp