CHARTER of alt.cellular.cingular

#11 (**permalink**) November 15th, 2007, 07:11 PM

In article <PBS4i.329147$7g3.209365@newsfe14.phx>,
"Mij Adyaw" <mij@SpamBucket.com> wrote:

> The questions: "Is the charter that Navas posted for this newsgroup
> correct?" If it is not correct, then we should correct the errors and post
> the correct charter. I have noticed that there are other usenet newsgroups
> that have charters and are unmoderated.
>
Same topics get posted in both groups.
I like the other group better. They're my kind of people.
I think I'll post there.
Wait - Only 12 people read both groups, anyway.
I'm so confused...

--
To reply by email, remove the word "space"

#12 (**permalink**) November 15th, 2007, 07:11 PM

In article <frT4i.3809$y_7.964@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>,
"Kevin Weaver" <kevinkeithweaver@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

> I don't see how it is. He breaks the rules himself.
>
I think everyone should write their own charter, then all meet in a
really loud bar so everyone can get completely hammered and resolve the
issue with a hearty brawl.
I'd go for the drinking part, anyway...

--
To reply by email, remove the word "space"

#13 (**permalink**) November 15th, 2007, 07:11 PM

WHAO ! Are you out of the denial? What gives? Did your flesh light
finally shake your brain into the right place?

[Copied to alt.cellular.attws. Please post all alt.cellular.cingular
posts to alt.cellular.attws as well. The Cingular name has gone away,
and alt.cellular.attws is the proper venue for posts regarding AT&T's
Wireless Service.]

In article <PrL5i.272992$ZA5.114193@newsfe15.phx>,
"Mij Adyaw" <mij@SpamBucket.com> wrote:

> Since the charter is not appropriate for the attws group, Navas should stop
> posting it there. Navas, have you considered only posting the charter to
> this newsgroup and not posting it to the attws newsgoup? Maybe that would
> stop some of the hostility towards you. What do you think?
>
>
>
> "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy71@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:38G5i.277$vq6.217@textfe.usenetserver.com...
> > In alt.cellular.cingular John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> All Big Eight newsgroups have charters.
> >> Many alt newsgroups have charters, but not all of them.
> >>
> >
> > Yes, and alt.cellular.attws does not have the charter that you post there,
> > but
> > as an ass, you continue to post an inappropriate and inapplicable charter
> > there.
> >
> > --
> > Thomas T. Veldhouse
> > Key Fingerprint: D281 77A5 63EE 82C5 5E68 00E4 7868 0ADC 4EFB 39F0
> >
> >
>
>

#14 (**permalink**) November 15th, 2007, 07:11 PM

Elmo P. Shagnasty wrote:
> In article <4659c50a$0$27252$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>,
> SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote:
>
>> It's more acquiescing to the wishes of AT&T, which has retired the
>> Cingular brand.
>
> AT&T has no wishes with respect to a Usenet newsgroup.

LOL, what they "wish" is for everything to be branded AT&T. In the press
releases they've been using "AT&T wireless (formerly, Cingular)." Note
the lower case w in wireless. They aren't branding it as "AT&T Wireless"
it's wireless from AT&T. In any case, "attws" is a pretty good match in
terms of a Usenet news group for "AT&T wireless."

[Copied to alt.cellular.attws. Please post all alt.cellular.cingular
non-spam posts to alt.cellular.attws as well. The Cingular name has gone
away, and alt.cellular.attws is the proper venue for posts regarding
AT&T's wireless service.]

#15 (**permalink**) November 15th, 2007, 07:11 PM

Todd Allcock wrote:
> Don't let "Mij" bait you. He posts these innocent-sounding little
> questions just to troll for angry repes (i.e. "Doesn't John OWN this
> group?" or "Didn't John start all of the cellular groups?") Word for word,
> Mij is probably the biggest trouble-maker here!

No doubt. And I think we all know that "Mij" is really someone else!

#16 (**permalink**) November 15th, 2007, 07:13 PM

On Thu, 24 May 2007 07:51:11 -0700, SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com>
wrote in <4655a657$0$27207$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>:

>Porgy Tirebiter wrote:
>>> The group is unmoderated.
>>>
>> You got it! Navas is indeed the "Village Idiot"
>
>Other than the posting of the charter to groups that it doesn't apply
>to, he seems to have changed in the past month or so. I only see
>follow-ups to his posts, as I have him kill-filed, but there have been
>very few of these.
>
>It seems that he's taken the April 1 posting about the "New Navas" to
>heart, and has reduced the shilling and the lies significantly. He's
>still illegally posting copyrighted news stories, but that's a
>relatively minor issue.

No such luck, Steven. I've just been very busy, not only with work, but
also because the busy summer racing season is now underway. (Latest
event pictures: <http://lyonsimaging.smugmug.com/gallery/2986163>)
I don't always have extra time to spend here correcting your endless
misstatements, not to mention it being pretty repetitive and boring.
;)

--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>

#17 (**permalink**) November 15th, 2007, 07:13 PM

On Wed, 23 May 2007 13:29:34 -0600, Todd Allcock
<elecconnec@AmericaOnLine.com> wrote in
<46548bd7$0$16347$88260bb3@free.teranews.com>:

>Don't let "Mij" bait you. He posts these innocent-sounding little
>questions just to troll for angry repes (i.e. "Doesn't John OWN this
>group?" or "Didn't John start all of the cellular groups?") Word for word,
>Mij is probably the biggest trouble-maker here!

He still has a long way to go to challenge our senior trolls (who of
course know who they are). ;)

--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>

#18 (**permalink**) November 15th, 2007, 07:13 PM

On Sun, 27 May 2007 13:21:18 -0700, SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com>
wrote in <4659e835$0$27193$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>:

>Todd Allcock wrote:
>> Don't let "Mij" bait you. He posts these innocent-sounding little
>> questions just to troll for angry repes (i.e. "Doesn't John OWN this
>> group?" or "Didn't John start all of the cellular groups?") Word for word,
>> Mij is probably the biggest trouble-maker here!
>
>No doubt.

Pot ... kettle ...

>And I think we all know that "Mij" is really someone else!

Really? We do? And who would that be?

--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>

#19 (**permalink**) November 15th, 2007, 07:13 PM

On Sun, 27 May 2007 13:20:02 -0700, SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com>
wrote in <4659e7e9$0$27193$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>:

>Elmo P. Shagnasty wrote:
>> In article <4659c50a$0$27252$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net>,
>> SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> It's more acquiescing to the wishes of AT&T, which has retired the
>>> Cingular brand.
>>
>> AT&T has no wishes with respect to a Usenet newsgroup.
>
>LOL, what they "wish" is for everything to be branded AT&T. In the press
>releases they've been using "AT&T wireless (formerly, Cingular)." Note
>the lower case w in wireless. They aren't branding it as "AT&T Wireless"
>it's wireless from AT&T. In any case, "attws" is a pretty good match in
>terms of a Usenet news group for "AT&T wireless."

Mountain out of a molehill. Give it a rest.

--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>