Charter of alt.cellular.attws

Charter of alt.cellular.attws

This group is for those who currently receive wireless service from
AT&T, and for those who wish to discuss issues regarding wireless
service from AT&T.

The group will allow for free discussion of issues, equipment, quality
of service problems, pricing plans, etc related to wireless services
from AT&T. This group will allow for AT&T's wireless users to help one
another with technical, service, equipment, and other issues.

This group is unmoderated. However it requested that the following
types of posts not be posted to the group:

-Copyrighted news stories, other than a brief description of the story
and a URL link.
-Equipment sales and auctions
-Personal attacks, including insults and flames
-Unsubstantiated claims regarding service issues and coverage
-Charters from other newsgroups
-Posts containing obscenities
-Spam
-Posts not related to wireless service from AT&T

wirelessatt@gmail.com wrote in news:1180999836.044567.40890
@i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com:

> Charter of alt.cellular.attws
>
> This group is for those who currently receive wireless service from
> AT&T, and for those who wish to discuss issues regarding wireless
> service from AT&T.
>
> The group will allow for free discussion of issues, equipment, quality
> of service problems, pricing plans, etc related to wireless services
> from AT&T. This group will allow for AT&T's wireless users to help one
> another with technical, service, equipment, and other issues.
>
> This group is unmoderated. However it requested that the following
> types of posts not be posted to the group:
>
> -Copyrighted news stories, other than a brief description of the story
> and a URL link.
> -Equipment sales and auctions
> -Personal attacks, including insults and flames
> -Unsubstantiated claims regarding service issues and coverage
> -Charters from other newsgroups
> -Posts containing obscenities
> -Spam
> -Posts not related to wireless service from AT&T
>
>

When was this charter created? If the answer is "today", you're as bad as
Navas.

Scott wrote:

<snip>

> When was this charter created? If the answer is "today", you're as bad as
> Navas.

LOL, I love it. Anyone can post a charter to alt.cellular.attws that's
equally as invalid as the one Navas spams.

This isn't a valid charter, since it is being made up after the fact.
An alt charter is created by the person creating the group. If you want
to make up a valid charter, then you'll have to start a new group.


On Mon, 04 Jun 2007 23:30:36 -0000, wirelessatt@gmail.com wrote in
<1180999836.044567.40890@i38g2000prf.googlegroups. com>:

>Charter of alt.cellular.attws
>
>This group is for those who currently receive wireless service from
>AT&T, and for those who wish to discuss issues regarding wireless
>service from AT&T.
>
>The group will allow for free discussion of issues, equipment, quality
>of service problems, pricing plans, etc related to wireless services
>from AT&T. This group will allow for AT&T's wireless users to help one
>another with technical, service, equipment, and other issues.
>
>This group is unmoderated. However it requested that the following
>types of posts not be posted to the group:
>
>-Copyrighted news stories, other than a brief description of the story
>and a URL link.
>-Equipment sales and auctions
>-Personal attacks, including insults and flames
>-Unsubstantiated claims regarding service issues and coverage
>-Charters from other newsgroups
>-Posts containing obscenities
>-Spam
>-Posts not related to wireless service from AT&T

--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>

Oh Yeah! Who grant you the right to post Cingular's Charter in attws?


[Copied to alt.cellular.attws. Please post all alt.cellular.cingular
non-spam posts to alt.cellular.attws as well. The Cingular name is going
away, and alt.cellular.attws is the proper venue for posts regarding
AT&T's Wireless Service.]

In article <8gob631ntjohs57f6iehqusqlj1u1a5ght@4ax.com>,
John Navas <spamfilter1@navasgroup.com> wrote:

> This isn't a valid charter, since it is being made up after the fact.
> An alt charter is created by the person creating the group. If you want
> to make up a valid charter, then you'll have to start a new group.
>
>
> On Mon, 04 Jun 2007 23:30:36 -0000, wirelessatt@gmail.com wrote in
> <1180999836.044567.40890@i38g2000prf.googlegroups. com>:
>
> >Charter of alt.cellular.attws
> >
> >This group is for those who currently receive wireless service from
> >AT&T, and for those who wish to discuss issues regarding wireless
> >service from AT&T.
> >
> >The group will allow for free discussion of issues, equipment, quality
> >of service problems, pricing plans, etc related to wireless services
> >from AT&T. This group will allow for AT&T's wireless users to help one
> >another with technical, service, equipment, and other issues.
> >
> >This group is unmoderated. However it requested that the following
> >types of posts not be posted to the group:
> >
> >-Copyrighted news stories, other than a brief description of the story
> >and a URL link.
> >-Equipment sales and auctions
> >-Personal attacks, including insults and flames
> >-Unsubstantiated claims regarding service issues and coverage
> >-Charters from other newsgroups
> >-Posts containing obscenities
> >-Spam
> >-Posts not related to wireless service from AT&T

sw wrote:
> Oh Yeah! Who grant you the right to post Cingular's Charter in attws?

LOL, the Cingular charter is as equally invalid as this charter in
alt.cellular.attws.

Navas is like Rodney Dangerfield. He just don't get no respect even though I
understand that he is a television personality.

"SMS" <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote in message
news:46666980$0$27219$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
> sw wrote:
>> Oh Yeah! Who grant you the right to post Cingular's Charter in attws?
>
> LOL, the Cingular charter is as equally invalid as this charter in
> alt.cellular.attws.

Yes he is. He moonlights as the Verizon guy. (Can you hear me now) :)

"Mij Adyaw" <mij@SpamBucket.com> wrote in message
news:x7G9i.406853$g24.253242@newsfe12.phx...
> Navas is like Rodney Dangerfield. He just don't get no respect even though
> I understand that he is a television personality.
>
> "SMS" <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote in message
> news:46666980$0$27219$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
>> sw wrote:
>>> Oh Yeah! Who grant you the right to post Cingular's Charter in attws?
>>
>> LOL, the Cingular charter is as equally invalid as this charter in
>> alt.cellular.attws.
>
>

He actually looks like a fatter and uglier version of William Shatner.

In article <x7G9i.406853$g24.253242@newsfe12.phx>,
"Mij Adyaw" <mij@SpamBucket.com> wrote:

> Navas is like Rodney Dangerfield. He just don't get no respect even though I
> understand that he is a television personality.
>
> "SMS" <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote in message
> news:46666980$0$27219$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
> > sw wrote:
> >> Oh Yeah! Who grant you the right to post Cingular's Charter in attws?
> >
> > LOL, the Cingular charter is as equally invalid as this charter in
> > alt.cellular.attws.
>
>

Now that is funny. Where can we see a picture of Navas?

"sw" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:nospam-23540A.23245006062007@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net ...
> He actually looks like a fatter and uglier version of William Shatner.
>
> In article <x7G9i.406853$g24.253242@newsfe12.phx>,
> "Mij Adyaw" <mij@SpamBucket.com> wrote:
>
>> Navas is like Rodney Dangerfield. He just don't get no respect even
>> though I
>> understand that he is a television personality.
>>
>> "SMS" <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote in message
>> news:46666980$0$27219$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net...
>> > sw wrote:
>> >> Oh Yeah! Who grant you the right to post Cingular's Charter in attws?
>> >
>> > LOL, the Cingular charter is as equally invalid as this charter in
>> > alt.cellular.attws.
>>
>>