["Followup-To:" header set to alt.cellular.verizon.]
On 2007-12-04, SMS <scharf.steven@gmail.com> wrote:
> 1. DSL is generally much cheaper than broadband cable, and naked DSL
> is usually no cheaper than a landline plus DSL.
In California's Victor Valley, Charter Cable internet seems to consistently
beat Verizon DSL and Verizon FiOS in terms of reliability, so at least in my
case, I wouldn't use DSL anyhow. (Even though I'm around the corner from the
Victorville CO and my house is surrounded by Verizon buildings.)
> 2. Using a landline allows you to select a lower cost cellular plan
> with fewer peak minutes. Usually the savings more than offset the cost
> of the landline.
If you like the carrier, that's great. I will never use AT&T for anything
again due to the royal screwing they tried to give me when I was an SBC
customer in Ohio. "never use for anything" includes wireless.
> 3. A landline is better for 911 service.
I'll agree with this and point #4.
> 7. Alarm systems often need a landline.
Alarm systems often need a dry copper pair. You don't necessarily need a
working landline. However, that depends on the provider and specific service
you're receiving from them.
> 8. Satellite TV boxes need a landline, and satellite TV service is
> much cheaper than cable TV service.
When I had DirecTV the only reason they recommended a landline was to enable
me to place orders for programming directly through the box.
--
Steve Sobol, Victorville, CA PGP:0xE3AE35ED
www.SteveSobol.com
Geek-for-hire. Details:
http://www.linkedin.com/in/stevesobol