Join the Wireless Phone Revolution for $10!

In article <4764e483.4144687@news.individual.net>,
bobmartin479@hotmail.com wrote:

> >> I'm glad that you too have noticed the idiocracy of crossposting
> >> wildly!!
> >>
> >>Thank you for the support!
> >
> >So why do you do it?
>
> If you haven't understood so far, the chance is very small you ever
> will.

That was way too easy.


--
Sandman[.net]

On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:43:24 -0700, Steve Carroll <noone@nowhere.net>
wrote:
>In article <4763e014.3010531@news.individual.net>,
> bobmartin479@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:02:49 -0700, Snit <CSMA@gallopinginsanity.com>
>> wrote:
>> >"bobmartin479@hotmail.com" <bobmartin479@hotmail.com> stated in post
>> >4762d988.1334031@news.individual.net on 12/11/07 11:45 AM:
>> >
>> >>> Well, back to the topic:
>> >>>
>> >>> You asked why I was posting to the Nokia group.
>> >>
>> >> Yes and you didn't even understand that!!!
>> >
>> >Sure I did - how else could I have answered your question? Man, you really
>> >do get confused easily.
>> >>
>> >>> I answered - and explained how Usenet works (in relation to most Usenet
>> >>> clients). You went off topic after that.
>> >>
>> >> Well , you thought you answered.
>> >
>> >Yes, I thought I answered - and I did. I can even point you to the post if
>> >you want, but I would prefer just to move forward.
>> >
>> >Now that you have been told how Usenet works I am curious if you have any
>> >other questions. Even though you did not thank me before I am happy to
>> >continue to assist you.
>> >
>> >Just as a reminder and to give you a bit more detail: with most Usenet
>> >clients when you see a post you want to respond to you can hit a "reply"
>> >button - and that allows you to reply to that post. By default you
>> >generally reply to all groups that were previously included (though
>> >follow-ups can be set to be different). Unless you know for certain what
>> >group the person (or people) you are responding to it makes sense to keep
>> >the follow-ups intact and to reply to all the groups. There are some
>> >immature or troublesome folks out there who this will offend, of course,
>> >being that many threads drift and may not be on topic for all groups, but it
>> >is not that big of a deal. If someone does not want to read a thread it is
>> >usually easy for them to set their reader to ignore it.
>> >
>> >> Off topic? you obviously don't know what that mean.
>> >
>> >While I am happy to see you try to gain some understanding of me, in this
>> >case you failed. Please do not try not try to act as my spokesperson...
>> >
>> >>> Care to try again? Can you stay on topic this time?
>> >>
>> >> No thank you.
>> >
>> >Well, then, either you did not really desire to learn the answer to your
>> >question or my answer did help you. Fair enough.
>> >
>> >> If you didn't understand the first time, I don't have the patience to
>> >> educate
>> >> you.
>> >
>> >Remember: you are the one who asked a question and had it answered. Clearly
>> >you have gotten confused.
>> >>
>> >> The topic? well I think $10 is way to expensive!! If it's going to be
>> >> a success, they have to lower the price.
>> >
>> >My responses are free... and priceless.
>>
>> You are more confused and clueless than I first thought. You haven't
>> undestood one single piece of my postings! You are way too mixed up.
>> You are typing a lot of words, but it's almost impossible to connect
>> it to my postings. I suspect you don't know what or who you are
>> answering.
>>
>> It's too much you haven't understood to base o conversation on.
>>
>> You need more help to sort out your thoughts. It would be inproper of
>> me to advice you over usenet.
>>
>> Good Luck!
>
>http://groups.google.com/group/comp....5b8c8befc960b2
>?dmode=source

Thanks for the clearifying link!

On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 20:51:10 +0100, Sandman <mr@sandman.net> wrote:
>In article <4764e483.4144687@news.individual.net>,
> bobmartin479@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>> >> I'm glad that you too have noticed the idiocracy of crossposting
>> >> wildly!!
>> >>
>> >>Thank you for the support!
>> >
>> >So why do you do it?
>>
>> If you haven't understood so far, the chance is very small you ever
>> will.
>
>That was way too easy.

I'm glad you find something easy! There is hope for you, after all.
>
>--
>Sandman[.net]

On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:43:24 -0700, Steve Carroll <noone@nowhere.net>
wrote:
>In article <4763e014.3010531@news.individual.net>,
> bobmartin479@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:02:49 -0700, Snit <CSMA@gallopinginsanity.com>
>> wrote:
>> >"bobmartin479@hotmail.com" <bobmartin479@hotmail.com> stated in post
>> >4762d988.1334031@news.individual.net on 12/11/07 11:45 AM:
>> >
>> >>> Well, back to the topic:
>> >>>
>> >>> You asked why I was posting to the Nokia group.
>> >>
>> >> Yes and you didn't even understand that!!!
>> >
>> >Sure I did - how else could I have answered your question? Man, you really
>> >do get confused easily.
>> >>
>> >>> I answered - and explained how Usenet works (in relation to most Usenet
>> >>> clients). You went off topic after that.
>> >>
>> >> Well , you thought you answered.
>> >
>> >Yes, I thought I answered - and I did. I can even point you to the post if
>> >you want, but I would prefer just to move forward.
>> >
>> >Now that you have been told how Usenet works I am curious if you have any
>> >other questions. Even though you did not thank me before I am happy to
>> >continue to assist you.
>> >
>> >Just as a reminder and to give you a bit more detail: with most Usenet
>> >clients when you see a post you want to respond to you can hit a "reply"
>> >button - and that allows you to reply to that post. By default you
>> >generally reply to all groups that were previously included (though
>> >follow-ups can be set to be different). Unless you know for certain what
>> >group the person (or people) you are responding to it makes sense to keep
>> >the follow-ups intact and to reply to all the groups. There are some
>> >immature or troublesome folks out there who this will offend, of course,
>> >being that many threads drift and may not be on topic for all groups, but it
>> >is not that big of a deal. If someone does not want to read a thread it is
>> >usually easy for them to set their reader to ignore it.
>> >
>> >> Off topic? you obviously don't know what that mean.
>> >
>> >While I am happy to see you try to gain some understanding of me, in this
>> >case you failed. Please do not try not try to act as my spokesperson...
>> >
>> >>> Care to try again? Can you stay on topic this time?
>> >>
>> >> No thank you.
>> >
>> >Well, then, either you did not really desire to learn the answer to your
>> >question or my answer did help you. Fair enough.
>> >
>> >> If you didn't understand the first time, I don't have the patience to
>> >> educate
>> >> you.
>> >
>> >Remember: you are the one who asked a question and had it answered. Clearly
>> >you have gotten confused.
>> >>
>> >> The topic? well I think $10 is way to expensive!! If it's going to be
>> >> a success, they have to lower the price.
>> >
>> >My responses are free... and priceless.
>>
>> You are more confused and clueless than I first thought. You haven't
>> undestood one single piece of my postings! You are way too mixed up.
>> You are typing a lot of words, but it's almost impossible to connect
>> it to my postings. I suspect you don't know what or who you are
>> answering.
>>
>> It's too much you haven't understood to base o conversation on.
>>
>> You need more help to sort out your thoughts. It would be inproper of
>> me to advice you over usenet.
>>
>> Good Luck!
>
>http://groups.google.com/group/comp....5b8c8befc960b2
>?dmode=source

Thanks for the clarifying link!

In article <4767eb73.5920921@news.individual.net>,
bobmartin479@hotmail.com wrote:

> >> >> I'm glad that you too have noticed the idiocracy of crossposting
> >> >> wildly!!
> >> >>
> >> >>Thank you for the support!
> >> >
> >> >So why do you do it?
> >>
> >> If you haven't understood so far, the chance is very small you ever
> >> will.
> >
> >That was way too easy.
>
> I'm glad you find something easy! There is hope for you, after all.

Now, play dead.


--
Sandman[.net]

"bobmartin479@hotmail.com" <bobmartin479@hotmail.com> stated in post
4765e81c.5066234@news.individual.net on 12/11/07 12:48 PM:

> On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:36:39 -0700, Snit <CSMA@gallopinginsanity.com>
> wrote:
>> "bobmartin479@hotmail.com" <bobmartin479@hotmail.com> stated in post
>> 4763e014.3010531@news.individual.net on 12/11/07 12:25 PM:
>>
>>> On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:02:49 -0700, Snit <CSMA@gallopinginsanity.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> "bobmartin479@hotmail.com" <bobmartin479@hotmail.com> stated in post
>>>> 4762d988.1334031@news.individual.net on 12/11/07 11:45 AM:
>>>>
>>>>>> Well, back to the topic:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You asked why I was posting to the Nokia group.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes and you didn't even understand that!!!
>>>>
>>>> Sure I did - how else could I have answered your question? Man, you really
>>>> do get confused easily.
>>>>>
>>>>>> I answered - and explained how Usenet works (in relation to most Usenet
>>>>>> clients). You went off topic after that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Well , you thought you answered.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, I thought I answered - and I did. I can even point you to the post if
>>>> you want, but I would prefer just to move forward.
>>>>
>>>> Now that you have been told how Usenet works I am curious if you have any
>>>> other questions. Even though you did not thank me before I am happy to
>>>> continue to assist you.
>>>>
>>>> Just as a reminder and to give you a bit more detail: with most Usenet
>>>> clients when you see a post you want to respond to you can hit a "reply"
>>>> button - and that allows you to reply to that post. By default you
>>>> generally reply to all groups that were previously included (though
>>>> follow-ups can be set to be different). Unless you know for certain what
>>>> group the person (or people) you are responding to it makes sense to keep
>>>> the follow-ups intact and to reply to all the groups. There are some
>>>> immature or troublesome folks out there who this will offend, of course,
>>>> being that many threads drift and may not be on topic for all groups, but
>>>> it
>>>> is not that big of a deal. If someone does not want to read a thread it is
>>>> usually easy for them to set their reader to ignore it.
>>>>
>>>>> Off topic? you obviously don't know what that mean.
>>>>
>>>> While I am happy to see you try to gain some understanding of me, in this
>>>> case you failed. Please do not try not try to act as my spokesperson...
>>>>
>>>>>> Care to try again? Can you stay on topic this time?
>>>>>
>>>>> No thank you.
>>>>
>>>> Well, then, either you did not really desire to learn the answer to your
>>>> question or my answer did help you. Fair enough.
>>>>
>>>>> If you didn't understand the first time, I don't have the patience to
>>>>> educate
>>>>> you.
>>>>
>>>> Remember: you are the one who asked a question and had it answered.
>>>> Clearly
>>>> you have gotten confused.
>>>>>
>>>>> The topic? well I think $10 is way to expensive!! If it's going to be
>>>>> a success, they have to lower the price.
>>>>
>>>> My responses are free... and priceless.
>>>
>>> You are more confused and clueless than I first thought.
>>
>> Where do you disagree with me? I am fine if you do, though I find it quite
>> telling that you voice your disagreement so rudely and while I you claim I
>> am "clueless" you point to not a single error in my claims.
>>
>>> You haven't undestood one single piece of my postings!
>>
>> I understood your question: You asked why I was posting to the Nokia group.
>
> I give up! I forgot there are such things as Asberger syndrom. I
> realise that now. If you can't read and understand what's behind the
> actual word... well then you can't. Sorry for making you reveal
> yourself. This is my last posting to you. I will have to put you in my
> killfile so I don't make the same mistake again. Sorry
>
>> I answered. You have shown no understanding of that answer, even though I
>> have given you more details, above. If the above information does not help
>> you to understand the answer to *your* question than it is your weakness,
>> not mine.
>>
>> <snip />
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and
>> conscientious stupidity. -- Martin Luther King, Jr.
>>
>
I forgive you.


--
I am one of only .3% of people who have avoided becoming a statistic.

On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:15:07 -0700, Snit <CSMA@gallopinginsanity.com>
wrote:
>"bobmartin479@hotmail.com" <bobmartin479@hotmail.com> stated in post
>4765e81c.5066234@news.individual.net on 12/11/07 12:48 PM:
>
>> On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:36:39 -0700, Snit <CSMA@gallopinginsanity.com>
>> wrote:
>>> "bobmartin479@hotmail.com" <bobmartin479@hotmail.com> stated in post
>>> 4763e014.3010531@news.individual.net on 12/11/07 12:25 PM:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 12:02:49 -0700, Snit <CSMA@gallopinginsanity.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> "bobmartin479@hotmail.com" <bobmartin479@hotmail.com> stated in post
>>>>> 4762d988.1334031@news.individual.net on 12/11/07 11:45 AM:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well, back to the topic:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You asked why I was posting to the Nokia group.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes and you didn't even understand that!!!
>>>>>
>>>>> Sure I did - how else could I have answered your question? Man, you really
>>>>> do get confused easily.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I answered - and explained how Usenet works (in relation to most Usenet
>>>>>>> clients). You went off topic after that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well , you thought you answered.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, I thought I answered - and I did. I can even point you to the post if
>>>>> you want, but I would prefer just to move forward.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now that you have been told how Usenet works I am curious if you have any
>>>>> other questions. Even though you did not thank me before I am happy to
>>>>> continue to assist you.
>>>>>
>>>>> Just as a reminder and to give you a bit more detail: with most Usenet
>>>>> clients when you see a post you want to respond to you can hit a "reply"
>>>>> button - and that allows you to reply to that post. By default you
>>>>> generally reply to all groups that were previously included (though
>>>>> follow-ups can be set to be different). Unless you know for certain what
>>>>> group the person (or people) you are responding to it makes sense to keep
>>>>> the follow-ups intact and to reply to all the groups. There are some
>>>>> immature or troublesome folks out there who this will offend, of course,
>>>>> being that many threads drift and may not be on topic for all groups, but
>>>>> it
>>>>> is not that big of a deal. If someone does not want to read a thread it is
>>>>> usually easy for them to set their reader to ignore it.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Off topic? you obviously don't know what that mean.
>>>>>
>>>>> While I am happy to see you try to gain some understanding of me, in this
>>>>> case you failed. Please do not try not try to act as my spokesperson...
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Care to try again? Can you stay on topic this time?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No thank you.
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, then, either you did not really desire to learn the answer to your
>>>>> question or my answer did help you. Fair enough.
>>>>>
>>>>>> If you didn't understand the first time, I don't have the patience to
>>>>>> educate
>>>>>> you.
>>>>>
>>>>> Remember: you are the one who asked a question and had it answered.
>>>>> Clearly
>>>>> you have gotten confused.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The topic? well I think $10 is way to expensive!! If it's going to be
>>>>>> a success, they have to lower the price.
>>>>>
>>>>> My responses are free... and priceless.
>>>>
>>>> You are more confused and clueless than I first thought.
>>>
>>> Where do you disagree with me? I am fine if you do, though I find it quite
>>> telling that you voice your disagreement so rudely and while I you claim I
>>> am "clueless" you point to not a single error in my claims.
>>>
>>>> You haven't undestood one single piece of my postings!
>>>
>>> I understood your question: You asked why I was posting to the Nokia group.
>>
>> I give up! I forgot there are such things as Asberger syndrom. I
>> realise that now. If you can't read and understand what's behind the
>> actual word... well then you can't. Sorry for making you reveal
>> yourself. This is my last posting to you. I will have to put you in my
>> killfile so I don't make the same mistake again. Sorry
>>
>>> I answered. You have shown no understanding of that answer, even though I
>>> have given you more details, above. If the above information does not help
>>> you to understand the answer to *your* question than it is your weakness,
>>> not mine.
>>>
>>
>I forgive you.

HA HA HA HA HA!!!!! you're just too much HA HA HA HA

"bobmartin479@hotmail.com" <bobmartin479@hotmail.com> stated in post
475ef981.3179625@news.individual.net on 12/11/07 1:59 PM:

>>> I give up! I forgot there are such things as Asberger syndrom. I
>>> realise that now. If you can't read and understand what's behind the
>>> actual word... well then you can't. Sorry for making you reveal
>>> yourself. This is my last posting to you. I will have to put you in my
>>> killfile so I don't make the same mistake again. Sorry
>>>
>>>> I answered. You have shown no understanding of that answer, even though I
>>>> have given you more details, above. If the above information does not help
>>>> you to understand the answer to *your* question than it is your weakness,
>>>> not mine.
>>>>
>>>
>> I forgive you.
>
> HA HA HA HA HA!!!!! you're just too much HA HA HA HA

"This is my last posting to you. I will have to put you in my
killfile so I don't make the same mistake again."

Do you need to be taught how to use a kill filter?



--
Never stand between a dog and the hydrant. - John Peers

bobmartin479@hotmail.com wrote in
news:4765e81c.5066234@news.individual.net:


>>--
>>Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and
>>conscientious stupidity. -- Martin Luther King, Jr.
>>
>
>

Nothing could describe you better, moron. You're the worst kind of troll-
a Pee Wee Herman look-a-like ("I know you are, but what am I?") Odds are
good that you share more than that with him.