Nokians: Nokia Cell Phone User Forum
 
Go Back   Nokians: Nokia Cell Phone User Forum > Usenet Discussion Forums > Verizon USA Usenet Discussions
Homepage Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Verizon USA Usenet Discussions Verizon USA Usenet Discussions

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21 (permalink)  
Old May 24th, 2008, 04:26 PM
DTC
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Sprint to impose 5 GB limit

Roger 2008 wrote:
> Not quite. If Sprint wanted to "follow" Verizon they would also remove
> Bluetooth PAN from their phones and then charge $20.00 a month more than
> they are now for their "unlimited" data plan.


Is Sprint TRYING to loose business?
Are they trying to go out of business?

If so, they are on teh right track.

Reminds me of when desperate people are in desperate deep doo-doo, they
to desperate and stupid things.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old May 24th, 2008, 04:26 PM
DTC
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Sprint to impose 5 GB limit

I shot of a letter to Sprint's upper managements.

Bob Johnson - Chief Service Officer replied:

"Mr. xxx, my apologies for the concerns over the data cap. Please
expect a call from my team shortly."


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old May 24th, 2008, 05:27 PM
Ness-Net
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Sprint to impose 5 GB limit


"Larry" <noone@home.com> wrote in message news:Xns9AA862877163Cnoonehomecom@208.49.80.253...
> "Ness-Net" <richard.nodamn@nessnet.spam.com> wrote in
> news:OKKdnbG7vqJ7A6rVnZ2dnUVZ_uWdnZ2d@giganews.com :
>
>> You mean the FREQUENCY auctions....?
>> I can see where you want to lead this, but sorry....
>> (bla bla - we the people own the airwaves, bla de bla)
>>
>>

>
> Wrong, asshole.....we're talking about GB of DATA.
>
> BANDWIDTH auctions are held continuously to sell unused bandwidth, which
> can't be stored of course, to recover some of the costs of the bandwidth
> owners.
>
> http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freea...number=1409248
>
> The big corporation has a nationwide bandwidth network it pays a lot of
> money for. This weekend, it's virtually shutdown for the holiday so all
> that bandwidth goes to waste, already paid for by the contract. So, the
> big corporation sells Mom's Tire and Internet Service or Verizon Wireless
> bandwidth for a bargain so Mom can maximize profits over the holiday
> weekend by NOT having to buy more bandwidth to satisfy her customers'
> heavy usage while they're all home on holiday.
>
> You guys don't really think ISPs, Sellphone carriers, cable companies,
> phone companies let you use all this bandwidth at home so cheap with them
> paying full price for bandwidth all the time, do you. I didn't think you
> were that stupid.
>
> Unused, after hours bandwidth, the kind the consumers use on weekends and
> when they get home from work, is bought and sold in online bandwidth
> auctions between the carriers and bandwidth-rich corporations to level
> the load. It has nothing to do with RADIO bandwidth, asshole-as-usual.
>
> Sellphone companies are trying to increase the already horrendous profits
> by limiting use of bandwidth so they don't have to buy enough to keep up
> with the ever-increasing demand of streaming, VoIP, downloading, P2P,
> gaming, etc. They simply forbid use or limit per customer use to some
> rediculously low level to keep them from sucking at the bandwidth tit.
> This lets us get $70/month X 5000 customers out of a minimal size pipe we
> buy from bandwidth auctions for peanuts, except during the business day
> when none or little is available and they have to pay full price. It's
> not anywhere NEAR as profitable as $1,282,000/GB sold to the really
> stupid SMS users at 20c for 156 bytes/message. Internet customers won't
> pay that much for such little bandwidth.....no matter how omnipotent the
> fat corporation thinks it is......
>
> Bandwidth is really cheap after business hours and on weekends and
> holidays....which is EXACTLY why Sellphone carriers let you talk
> unlimited on digital, the same bandwidth as data uses, all day
> Saturday....on bandwidth going to waste.
>
>


Sorry bucko, about as far from reality as possible. And, I don't have to
call you any names...... just show you to be totally wrong - again.

When I sell a T1, DS3, OC3/12/48/etc, or maybe a 100M or GigE pipe, they
pay for the ports AND bandwidth used on THAT pipe. Pipes used to connect
sites to switches, to build metro rings or connect switches to the PSTN. These
port charges are fixed and if the customer is paying for the entire pipe's
bandwidth capacity, this is a fixed (via contract) charge as well. No "auction".
This is the way the vast majority of the networking world works - if not all.

You are blathering on about BACKBONE bandwidth - and I'll tell you that most
is purchased the same way - ex: OC3/12/48 or 192 is $X for the ports, $X for the bandwidth.
Sign here for a 3 or 5 year term. Same for DWDM wavelengths and even lowly T1s.
You mention frame in the past - know what a CIR is? Guess what - you pay for it as well.

The CONCEPT of bandwidth auctions has been rattling around for years. Back
in 99-2000 one of the biggies in this was - ding! Enron. Where are they now??
You site a white paper on the concept - it is far from actual reality - just like you...

Larry, get a clue. 'Cause in this discussion - you haven't got even a tiny one.
Just your normal conspiracy prattlle - must be tough to be so paranoid!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old May 24th, 2008, 09:01 PM
Larry
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Sprint to impose 5 GB limit

DTC <me@nothingtoseehere.zzx> wrote in news:JFZZj.1202$uE5.249
@flpi144.ffdc.sbc.com:

> You still don't get it.
>
> Everything you are ranting about is the overall network bandwidth.
>
> Its the all about the BACKHAUL bandwidth to and from each tower.
>
>


I'll bite. What IS this mysterious "backhaul bandwidth to and from the
tower".....SPECIFICALLY. Is it a 1.5Mbps T1? T3? Tell us, please.

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old May 24th, 2008, 10:33 PM
DTC
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Sprint to impose 5 GB limit

Larry wrote:
> DTC <me@nothingtoseehere.zzx> wrote in news:JFZZj.1202$uE5.249
> @flpi144.ffdc.sbc.com:
>
>> You still don't get it.
>>
>> Everything you are ranting about is the overall network bandwidth.
>>
>> Its the all about the BACKHAUL bandwidth to and from each tower.
>>
>>

>
> I'll bite. What IS this mysterious "backhaul bandwidth to and from the
> tower".....SPECIFICALLY. Is it a 1.5Mbps T1? T3? Tell us, please.


There is nothing mysterious about the back haul, its simply the
way all cells connect back to the NOC. For some towers it might be a T1,
for others near the fiber right of way it might be a fiber tap.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old May 24th, 2008, 10:33 PM
DTC
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Sprint to impose 5 GB limit

Ness-Net wrote:
> You (Larry) are blathering on about BACKBONE bandwidth


Yep and he doesn't have a clue how its different from a back haul.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old May 24th, 2008, 10:33 PM
George
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Sprint to impose 5 GB limit

Larry wrote:
> DTC <me@nothingtoseehere.zzx> wrote in news:JFZZj.1202$uE5.249
> @flpi144.ffdc.sbc.com:
>
>> You still don't get it.
>>
>> Everything you are ranting about is the overall network bandwidth.
>>
>> Its the all about the BACKHAUL bandwidth to and from each tower.
>>
>>

>
> I'll bite. What IS this mysterious "backhaul bandwidth to and from the
> tower".....SPECIFICALLY. Is it a 1.5Mbps T1? T3? Tell us, please.
>

You are bitching and calling people names and you don't even understand
how a cell system works?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old May 25th, 2008, 12:49 AM
Ness-Net
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Sprint to impose 5 GB limit


"Larry" <noone@home.com> wrote in message news:Xns9AA8C914CE021noonehomecom@208.49.80.253...
> DTC <me@nothingtoseehere.zzx> wrote in news:JFZZj.1202$uE5.249
> @flpi144.ffdc.sbc.com:
>
>> You still don't get it.
>>
>> Everything you are ranting about is the overall network bandwidth.
>>
>> Its the all about the BACKHAUL bandwidth to and from each tower.
>>
>>

>
> I'll bite. What IS this mysterious "backhaul bandwidth to and from the
> tower".....SPECIFICALLY. Is it a 1.5Mbps T1? T3? Tell us, please.


You ARE kidding, right??

Nothing "mysterious" here at all - (unless you are a conspiracy loon)...

Nothing "mysterious" about a T1 or two, or a DS3, or an OC12 or OC48
metro ring. Or a microwave hop here and there out to the boonies.
Networks can be very elaborate - but certainly not "mysterious"....

The answer to your (obviously VERY clueless) question is - it all depends.

A site out in the country may have a single T1. (Remember a T1 is 24 channels).
Obviously, a big city site will have considerably more demand on it than 24
simultaneous conversations. So, 2X or 3X T1, or maybe a DS3?? Then, there
is the data bandwidth needed for, say EVDO traffic in VZW's case. More pipe
needed there. Yep, no mystery here. Maybe just some artful engineering...

Sometimes, I seriously wish I wasn't under NDA. Let's just say you know pipe
organs. I know bandwidth, backhaul, fiber and backbones. This is MY gig....




Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

(View-All Members who have read this thread : 0
There are no names to display.
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AT&T to limit unlimited data plans to 5GB a month? 4phun AT&T Usenet Discussions 9 January 17th, 2008 09:13 PM
Apple ups iPhone purchase limit to five 4phun AT&T Usenet Discussions 3 December 17th, 2007 07:36 PM
The 5 GB limit Dave Rudisill Verizon USA Usenet Discussions 31 December 12th, 2007 01:37 AM
The 5 GB limit The Ghost of General Lee Alltel News Server Discussions 0 December 1st, 2007 03:12 PM
gsm range limit miso@sushi.com GSM Usenet Discussions 6 November 16th, 2007 04:31 PM



Current poll
The new design of the forum is..

Excellent: 100.00%

Good: 0%

Average: 0%

Could be better: 0%

Bad: 0%
Voters: 1. You may not vote on this poll

Forum Stats
Topics: 12120
Posts: 61595
Users: 981
Active Members: 511
We welcome our newest user: sharkbaitbil
Most users ever online was 90, October 13th, 2008 at 02:44 PM.
New users:
Today
- sharkbaitbil
Today
- ellainema
Yesterday
- israel75
November 30th, 2008
- gadgeteeer
November 29th, 2008
- cellscells

Today's Birthdays
No one has birthday today.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
copyright © Nokians.netAd Management by RedTyger