David Moyer <meetme@world.com> wrote in news:meetme-D115CA.18100911062008
@news.qwest.net:
> In article <Xns9AB8B1014A096noonehomecom@208.49.80.253>,
> Larry <noone@home.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Are YOU going to give them a HUNDRED DOLLARS PER YEAR for MobileMe?
>>
>> A HUNDRED DOLLARS?!!
>>
>> ARE YOU CRAZY?!!
>
> the price is more like $74, not $100!
>
> i've used "MobileMe" for 5 years and it's wonderful, best integrated
> service available on any platform.
>
In article <Xns9ABB6D2C6553noonehomecom@208.49.80.253>,
Larry <noone@home.com> wrote:
> > the price is more like $74, not $100!
> >
> > i've used "MobileMe" for 5 years and it's wonderful, best integrated
> > service available on any platform.
>
> You'd better check that NEW price, again....$99!
but that's the FULL retail price, not the "google shopping" price.
i've used mobileme for many years and never paid more than $78, when the
full "list price" was always $99.
larry, you might want to stop posting for awhile, you simply don't know
anything about what you speak...
David Moyer <meetme@world.com> amazed us all with the following in
news:meetme-0928EE.09463012062008@n003-000-000-000.static.ge.com:
> In article <Xns9ABB6D2C6553noonehomecom@208.49.80.253>,
> Larry <noone@home.com> wrote:
>
>> > the price is more like $74, not $100!
>> >
>> > i've used "MobileMe" for 5 years and it's wonderful, best integrated
>> > service available on any platform.
>>
>> You'd better check that NEW price, again....$99!
>
> but that's the FULL retail price, not the "google shopping" price.
>
> i've used mobileme for many years and never paid more than $78, when the
> full "list price" was always $99.
>
> larry, you might want to stop posting for awhile, you simply don't know
> anything about what you speak...
>
Why would I pay for something that I already get for free?