"4phun" <vic.healey@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:d8eb18b7-ce87-4a89-bde8-c738fb90b806@f36g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 9, 9:01 am, George <geo...@nospam.invalid> wrote:
> David Moyer wrote:
> > In article <MPG.22de5c42e44d68b989...@news.individual.net>,
> > Jim Mason <jim.ma...@removethisukonline.co.uk> wrote:
>
> >>> Just posted - The very first reviews of the new iPhon
> >> Why do you think this is relevant to alt.cellular.nokia?
>
> > proly cuz lots of nokia users are interested in the iphone, that's why.
>
> You just don't understand. The fanbois whose entire existence is defined
> by an electronic device think it is so important (in their minds) that
> they need to "convert" everyone else even if they could care less.
If you do not caare for the iPhone have enough maturity to ignore it
and move on without wasting everyones else's time with comments like
the above when there are those who are looking for information and
appreciate posts on iPhone 3G developments. Another words GET A LIFE.
There is a difference between the two. Knowing and then the BS you spew over
and over again. It's you that need's to get the life.
> > Golly gee, it's too bad that you can't buy a spare or extended battery
on
> > iPhone the way that you can on real cell phones.
>
> sure you can, any iPod or iPhone battery extender will work fine.
>
> http://www.thepocketsolution.com/PSI-35159.html
So much for thin... Now your iPhone can be as thick as my Tilt!
> geeesh, you know nothing about what you speak.
He was limiting the discussion to swappable, user replaceable batteries, I
assume.
No problem, though- as you've always said, the iPhone battery is certainly
user replaceable- instead of the products you mentioned above, you could
just carry this:
> > > proly cuz lots of nokia users are interested in the iphone, that's why.
> >
> > You just don't understand. The fanbois whose entire existence is defined
> > by an electronic device think it is so important (in their minds) that
> > they need to "convert" everyone else even if they could care less.
>
> If you do not caare for the iPhone have enough maturity to ignore it
> and move on without wasting everyones else's time with comments like
> the above when there are those who are looking for information and
> appreciate posts on iPhone 3G developments. Another words GET A LIFE.
That doesn't excuse Oxford's continued crossposting. Where does your
slippery slope end? Are the Cletus KKK posts here ok because someone might
"appreciate" racist drivel? Maybe the recent Islamaspam is ok because it
might be interesting to someone on a cellphone NG?
The point stands that anyone who might "appreciate posts on iPhone 3G
developments" can go to the SEVERAL groups where such posts are actually ON
TOPIC, and don't need Oxford, you, or I to "deliver" them elsewhere.
David Moyer <davmoy@world.com> amazed us all with the following in
news:davmoy-A59ED3.20124509072008@news.qwest.net:
> Mark Crispin <mrc@Panda.COM> wrote:
>
>> > - "started receiving low battery warnings toward the end of a busy
>> > work day; I found myself charging the device overnight, the same as
>> > with the older iPhone."
>>
>> Golly gee, it's too bad that you can't buy a spare or extended
>> battery on iPhone the way that you can on real cell phones.
>
> sure you can, any iPod or iPhone battery extender will work fine.
Battery extender? I thought the iPhone battery kept a charge for weeks.
At least that's what you were saying a year ago. Right about the same time
you were preaching that wifi would be the 3g killers.
Wow- my laptop would be easier and lighter to use than that amalgamation of
electronic odds and ends. And it shoots the whole"form" argument all to
hell.
SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com> amazed us all with the following in
news:pufdk.13780$xZ.6393@nlpi070.nbdc.sbc.com:
> David Moyer wrote:
>
>> Edward Baig / USA Today
>> - "iPhone 3G: The Sequel, is worth the wait."
>> - Still no recording video, no stereo bluetooth or voice dialing
>
> I can't believe that they still have no voice dialing. Is there _any_
> other current cell phone model that doesn't have voice dialing?
>
My daughter's $50 Samsung has voice dialing. The Razr had voice dialing. I
can't think of any phone considered new that doesn't.
In article <pufdk.13780$xZ.6393@nlpi070.nbdc.sbc.com>, SMS
<scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote:
> > Edward Baig / USA Today
> > - "iPhone 3G: The Sequel, is worth the wait."
> > - Still no recording video, no stereo bluetooth or voice dialing
>
> I can't believe that they still have no voice dialing. Is there _any_
> other current cell phone model that doesn't have voice dialing?
i've never seen voice dialing work particularly well, but nevertheless,
at least one third party (and i think more than just one but i can't
remember whom) has announced voice dialing support.
In article <%sfdk.13778$xZ.10956@nlpi070.nbdc.sbc.com>,
SMS <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote:
> David Moyer wrote:
>
> > "It was a true hand-held computer..."
>
> Huh? In reality it was a web pad/phone/MP3 player. It was _not_ a
> hand-held computer. You couldn't even do a spreadsheet on it.
the official description is:
The iPhone combines three products in one ‹ a revolutionary phone, a
widescreen iPod, and a breakthrough Internet device with rich HTML email
and a desktop-class web browser. i
First Reviews of the 3G iPhone!!
Linear Mode
